Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • NGS_user
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 9

    Statistical analysis

    Hi folks,
    I am a bit confused as to the possible statistical tools I could use in my analyses. Basically I have a number of observed genes for each gene family and a list of the number of known genes per family. the numbers of the observed are much much lower than the expected as I used universal primers and have smaller subsets of these gene families. If I do a chi square test it tells me I have significant differences. My distribution visually looks the same as the expected distribution so the of genes are similar relative to the other families, is there some statistical analysis where I can compare numbers of observed and expected with respect to other observed and expected numbers?
  • colindaven
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2008
    • 417

    #2
    Sounds like the Chi square test you've already done would be helpful. Check out the means, medians and distribution.

    Also check the Chi square value. You might want to control for multiple testing with Bonferroni correction as you may indeed only have a tiny variation in your data which is "significant" because of many tests.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 11:05 AM
    0 responses
    6 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    28 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    25 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    25 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...