Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • emilyjia2000
    Member
    • May 2011
    • 59

    Variant call using BAM from Tophat

    Hello,

    I used tophat on mapping of RNA-seq samples, after running TopHat I got accepted_hit.bam file. Is it possible to use this BAM on the variant call analysis using Samtools? I overheard that BAM from TopHat is not good to variant call, but I don't know the reason. Which are alignment tools good for RNA-seq to do the variant call?

    many thanks,
  • chadn737
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2009
    • 392

    #2
    I would also be interested in this answer as well.

    I wonder if it has anything to do with the fact that Tophat does not take into account quality scores while doing alignments, whereas aligners like MAQ do? However MAQ I think can't handle splicing, so is not a very good option for RNA-seq.
    Last edited by chadn737; 08-01-2011, 01:01 PM.

    Comment

    • emilyjia2000
      Member
      • May 2011
      • 59

      #3
      By the way, the data was process by Illumina, does Eland alignment work well on variant call? or BWA?

      Comment

      • emilyjia2000
        Member
        • May 2011
        • 59

        #4
        chadn737,
        If that is the case, is it possible to use samtools filter to filter out the lower quality score?

        Comment

        • chadn737
          Senior Member
          • Jan 2009
          • 392

          #5
          I have no experience with ELAND. However, you should be able to filter out low quality alignments with samtools, so one approach would be to use Tophat, make variant calls, and then filter.

          Comment

          • honey
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2010
            • 151

            #6
            TopHAT

            I believe TopHat is manily align at junctions with the help of Bowtie? How about if you use Botiwe an duse samtools. I am not very sure?

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by SEQadmin2


              I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

              Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
              06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
            0 responses
            16 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
            0 responses
            17 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
            0 responses
            20 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
            0 responses
            54 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...