Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ocs
    Member
    • May 2011
    • 27

    IGV reads (grey vs white)

    Hello folks,

    concerning the Integrative Genomics Viewer:
    What is the difference between the white and the grey reads? Some reads in the alignment are all filled with grey and some are outlined with grey but filled with white. I couldn't find any answer in the manual (http://www.broadinstitute.org/softwa.../AlignmentData).

    Thanks in advance,
    best regards,
    Oliver
  • Seq84
    Member
    • Feb 2011
    • 19

    #2
    Hi,
    Reads filled with white have mapping quality score = 0
    best regards,
    Matteo

    Comment

    • ocs
      Member
      • May 2011
      • 27

      #3
      Thanks!
      Does this mean that they are aligned just by desperation?

      Comment

      • nilshomer
        Nils Homer
        • Nov 2008
        • 1283

        #4
        It usually means there are two or more equally likely locations, and so this location was randomly chosen from that set.

        Comment

        • ocs
          Member
          • May 2011
          • 27

          #5
          Hello nilshomer,

          thanks for your answer. Its a bit confusing, I can think of two equally likly locations that both have a great mapping quality but then its set to zero because its ambiguous?

          Comment

          • Jim Robinson
            Member
            • May 2009
            • 75

            #6
            First apologies this was not documented, we'll correct that. I agree its confusing, I think ambiguous mappings should be indicated by a separate score or field, but that's the way it is.

            Jim

            Comment

            • Orr Shomroni
              Member
              • Oct 2011
              • 26

              #7
              Hello everyone,

              To continue on this grey vs. white issue, I have an IGV plot containing 2 reads: 1 long at a certain position, and another slightly shorter which is one position afterwards (i.e. in terms of positions, the small read is contained within the range of the big read). In IGV, the big read is marked white (i.e. can be aligned elsewhere), the small is grey, and the big read has no SNPs/Indels in its edges. The question is, how is it possible that a certain read can be aligned to multiple positions, whereas its subsequence is unique?
              On the same note, which tool determines whether a read can be mapped to multiple locations (i.e. white bar)? Can IGV calculate that itself?
              "Though it may seem that all's been said and done, originality still lives on" - some unoriginal guy who had nothing better to write as his signature

              Comment

              • Jim Robinson
                Member
                • May 2009
                • 75

                #8
                Hi,

                IGV is not making any judgement calls, is is using the mapping quality. It is a convention with at least some aligners (BWA), if not all aligners, that mapping quality == 0 means the read is not uniquely mapped. IGV does not do any calculation. So if you want to take all interpretation out of the picture a "white" read simply means that the mapping quality has been set to zero by the aligner.

                Jim

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • GATTACAT
                  Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                  by GATTACAT
                  Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                  07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                  by SEQadmin2


                  I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                  Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                  06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
                0 responses
                9 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
                0 responses
                13 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
                0 responses
                20 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
                0 responses
                54 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...