Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ori
    Member
    • Jun 2011
    • 13

    velveth_de running time and mem

    Hi,

    I have a set of approx 200M reads that I would like to run on velvet.

    Could you please share your experience with velveth_de running time and mem consumption?

    Thanks
  • Ori
    Member
    • Jun 2011
    • 13

    #2
    I guess I should be a bit more specific with the question

    I've tried to run velveth_de on that set of ~200M reads on local machine (quad core, 12Gb ram). 24h later it is still busy (nothing written to Roadmaps...).

    Has anybody similar experience? Tips?

    Thanks

    Comment

    • usad
      Member
      • Sep 2009
      • 53

      #3
      Hi Ori,

      There is the paper of Zhnag et al Practical comparison of de novo genome assembly
      also have a look at the wiki how to (http://seqanswers.com/wiki/How-to). This also links to a formula for RAM consumption which was posted in the velvet discussion list
      Maybe you can even add in your experience about velvet.

      Generally however one would need to know more about your genome coverage etc....

      Cheers,
      bjrön

      Comment

      • Ori
        Member
        • Jun 2011
        • 13

        #4
        Thanks for the info!

        I see quite a few velvet runs in front of me, so if I have something interesting, I'll be glad to share

        Comment

        • eslondon
          Member
          • Jul 2009
          • 21

          #5
          We have opted for much less memory-hungry algorithms, like Abyss (a bit less friendly), SOAPDenovo, and CLC Bio. Every genome and every set and mixture of read types has different performance depending on the aligner, but at least with CLC Bio, SoapDenovo, etc. you can run many runs, alter parameters, because they are fast and much less memory-hungry...
          --------------------------------------
          Elia Stupka
          Co-Director and Head of Unit
          Center for Translational Genomics and Bioinformatics
          San Raffaele Scientific Institute
          Via Olgettina 58
          20132 Milano
          Italy
          ---------------------------------------

          Comment

          • Ori
            Member
            • Jun 2011
            • 13

            #6
            A little update.

            I was running velveth with my set of reads on a bit bigger machine. Still, the memory usage peaked up to 72Gb, filling whole available ram and velvet got very very slow.
            So I will try another machine with even more muscles...

            I'm planning to try more assemblers during the project.
            About velvet and memory its consumption I just curious and intend to figure it out

            Comment

            • ehscholl
              Junior Member
              • Nov 2008
              • 3

              #7
              Ori - any updates? I'm running velveth on 12.5M reads, 10M are short, 2M are longer (mostly 454, some sanger).

              I did the 10M short reads on my workstation (16GB RAM) with no problem. Adding the extra 2M, I've been running for about a week with all of the RAM taken. I estimate about a week left in the run

              Comment

              • Ori
                Member
                • Jun 2011
                • 13

                #8
                Hej ehscholl!

                Yes, I have some updates
                I filtered my read set rather harsh, reducing total count to approx 80M.
                velveth (k-mer 21 to 31) took 18h to complete, memory peaking at approx 90Gb
                velvetg took from 4h to 1h to complete, memory peaking at approx 30Gb

                Thanks for reminding to share the experience!

                Comment

                • cam.jack
                  Member
                  • Jun 2011
                  • 11

                  #9
                  Ori - it would be very helpful if you said how big you expected your final genome to be and the expected coverage you have (also the length of your reads would be good).

                  Thanks.

                  Comment

                  • Ori
                    Member
                    • Jun 2011
                    • 13

                    #10
                    hej,

                    some info:
                    expected genome size 18-24mb
                    expected coverage 10-30x
                    reads 35bp

                    Comment

                    • cam.jack
                      Member
                      • Jun 2011
                      • 11

                      #11
                      Thanks for that Ori,

                      Comment

                      Latest Articles

                      Collapse

                      • GATTACAT
                        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                        by GATTACAT
                        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
                      • SEQadmin2
                        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                        by SEQadmin2


                        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

                      ad_right_rmr

                      Collapse

                      News

                      Collapse

                      Topics Statistics Last Post
                      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
                      0 responses
                      6 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
                      0 responses
                      11 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
                      0 responses
                      19 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
                      0 responses
                      53 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Working...