Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • schaffer
    Member
    • Apr 2009
    • 12

    RNA-Seq compare edgeR, cufflinks, Partek

    Hi,
    I have compared RNA-Seq in 3 different platforms and get 3 different lists of differential gene expression. Has anyone done this kind of comparison?
    What do you think about this?
    Lana
  • severin
    Genome Informatics Facility
    • Sep 2009
    • 105

    #2
    how different?

    Are the 3 lists from the same set of data?
    What percentage of genes are the same? different?
    Are the programs using different statistical tests to make the comparisons?
    Do they all incorporate/deal with replicates the same way?
    What are the cutoff p-value used in each? Do they all correct for FDR?

    I would be surprised if you had no genes in common between the three programs.

    Comment

    • mgogol
      Senior Member
      • Mar 2008
      • 197

      #3
      Are there really NO genes in common? Do they share gene ontology terms or pathways?

      Unfortunately, I think it's pretty common in bioinformatics for the analysis techniques to have large effects on the final list of genes and their rank. You could test genes from each list with qpcr to try to see which are the most solid.

      Comment

      • Simon Anders
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2010
        • 995

        #4
        There are a couple of threads that may be of interest, including these:

        Application of sequencing to RNA analysis (RNA-Seq, whole transcriptome, SAGE, expression analysis, novel organism mining, splice variants)

        Discussion of next-gen sequencing related bioinformatics: resources, algorithms, open source efforts, etc

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        18 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        20 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        21 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        54 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...