Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • nii
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2010
    • 2

    #1

    454 quality score, z-score,..

    Hey!
    I read something about 454 sequencing, but there are some things I don't understand. (http://www.nature.com/nature/journal...ture03959.html)

    Quality Score: Why is the quality score the probability, that a homopolymer of at least length n caused the signal, not exactly length n? And in the formula, the j-variable of the sum-symbol goes from n to infinity?

    Z-Score: If we need a reference sequence to calculate the Z-Score, we can only use it when resequencing a genome, not when we are doing a de novo assembly. In the supplementary methods it says it is also applicalbe when doing the de novo sequencing, but how? Just align the reads? And what is aligned, the peaks of the flowgrams?
    Furthermore, if the Z-Score is the difference between the averaged signal values of the different reads and the nearest integer, divided by the standard deviation of the read signals, wouldn't an averaged signal of e.g. 6.5 give rise to a higher Z-Score than an averaged signal of 6.9 when having the same standard deviation?? Or do I misinterpret the meaning of the Z-Score (confidence, that there is one particular base at a particular position)?

    Flow order: There appear two PPi Kernels during sequencing. Are they used to measure the amount of enzyme-beads and fragments (to correct the signal strength for each well)?

    Thanks,
    david
  • TSR
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2011
    • 2

    #2
    454 quality score

    Hi,

    as far as I can tell, there must be an error in the quality score definition...

    In the link you provide above (http://www.nature.com/nature/journal...ture03959.html), Margulies et al. (2005) states that the quality score is:
    Q = -10 log10( P(≥n|s) )
    where s is the observed signal and n is the length of the homopolymer that produced the signal.

    That would mean that:
    Q = 40 <=> P(≥n|s) = 0.0001
    Q = 20 <=> P(≥n|s) = 0.01

    So the probability that the homopolymer is of length ≥n is higher when the quality score is lower! That must be a mistake.

    How should one interpret the quality scores?

    Margulies (2005) writes:
    "For instance, if two A’s are called for a particular signal, the quality score for the second A is given by the probability that the observed signal came from a homopolymer of length two or greater."
    Here is some real 454 data:
    Code:
    Position: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10 11
    Residue:  T  G  G  G  A  G  G  G  G  A  T 
    Quality:  30 27 30 30 28 14 14 13 13 19 20
    So in the data above, what does it mean (in terms of probabilities), that:
    a) position 2 has lower quality than the rest of the homopolymer?
    b) position 7 has higher quality than the rest of the homopolymer?

    Anybody know how the quality score is calculated (eg. sourcecode)?

    Cheers,
    T
    Last edited by TSR; 08-30-2011, 04:05 AM.

    Comment

    • zhengyuanwang
      Junior Member
      • Oct 2011
      • 1

      #3
      454 quality score, no error

      Their formula and coding are fine.
      Reported is the probability to their ERROR Model.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
        by SEQadmin2



        Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

        Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
        ...
        10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
        by SEQadmin2


        Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

        We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
        ...
        09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:13 AM
      0 responses
      19 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:48 AM
      0 responses
      18 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
      0 responses
      36 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
      0 responses
      42 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...