Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • lisa1102
    Junior Member
    • Oct 2011
    • 4

    #1

    Average Read Coverage for 454 paired end read data

    Hi
    I have just received some paired end read data from 454 flx sequencer. The coverage is 6X for three of my samples and 3X for one of my samples.
    These samples are microbes with no reference strain.
    Can anyone tell me if this coverage is the norm?
    Thanks,
    Lisa
  • MissDNA
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 146

    #2
    Coverage depends on the size of your genomes. Do you have any idea of sizes?
    Also, what kind of PE was it?

    In our last 3kb PE run, we sequenced 2 bacteria in a 2 lane PTP. The 1st one had a genome around 4.5M and the coverage was 56X. The other one is larger than 7M and we got 16X coverage. We knew the 2nd library was not very good but decided to sequence anyway.

    So if your organisms were small, I think 6x and 3x coverage is not very good.

    Comment

    • pmiguel
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2008
      • 2328

      #3
      Hi Lisa,
      You will have to give us more to go on. Like how many and what type of regions were used on the 454 sequencer? Also what genome size are your microbes?

      --
      Phillip

      Comment

      • vamosia
        Member
        • Mar 2009
        • 15

        #4
        On my previous microbes projects, 20X seems to be the depth that works well with Newbler. More depth will typically break the contig more since the errors accumulate and less depth does not generate enough signal.

        But this is not absolute and it depends on your genome.

        Comment

        • lisa1102
          Junior Member
          • Oct 2011
          • 4

          #5
          Hi
          Thanks for your comments. This is the only information I have at present. The size of the genomes is 2.7MB for the 6X coverage and 1.5MB for the 3X coverage.
          If people think that 20X is average then is anything I can do to improve the analyses or is it best to repeat the runs?

          Comment

          • MissDNA
            Senior Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 146

            #6
            Don't you know how the PTP was divided: 2, 4, 8 or 16 regions? If you had a sample per region in a 2-lane PTP the coverage you got is way too low. How was the library prep?

            Comment

            • lisa1102
              Junior Member
              • Oct 2011
              • 4

              #7
              I don't have that information of the sample per region at the moment. I am waiting for the information. The only information I have on the library prep is from the protocol "Paired end lib prep method manual - 20kb and 8kb span"

              Comment

              • MissDNA
                Senior Member
                • Nov 2010
                • 146

                #8
                I never worked with 8 and 20kb libraired. My experience is with 3kb.
                My recomendation is you need to gather all the info: about quality of the library, number of reads generated, and how the PTP was divided before deciding what to do next.

                Comment

                • lisa1102
                  Junior Member
                  • Oct 2011
                  • 4

                  #9
                  Yes Thanks for your comments. This will help me pose more specific questions.

                  Comment

                  Latest Articles

                  Collapse

                  • SEQadmin2
                    Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                    by SEQadmin2



                    Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                    Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                    ...
                    10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
                  • SEQadmin2
                    New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
                    by SEQadmin2


                    Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

                    We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
                    ...
                    09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

                  ad_right_rmr

                  Collapse

                  News

                  Collapse

                  Topics Statistics Last Post
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
                  0 responses
                  23 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
                  0 responses
                  20 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
                  0 responses
                  36 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
                  0 responses
                  42 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Working...