Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ngon
    Junior Member
    • Sep 2011
    • 1

    #1

    HiSeq multiplexing for strand specific RNA library prep

    Greetings, fellow scientists!

    I am a grad student and my first task in lab is to pioneer a gene expression experiment to be run on the HiSeqSQ. I will be using RNA from mouse brain, I want to multiplex, and I'd like to obtain paired-end reads. I have lots of questions and any help would be greatly appreciated!

    I'm intrigued by a recent protocol published by CSH, 'High-Throughput Illumina Strand-Specific RNA Sequencing Library Preparation' by Zhong S et al (http://cshprotocols.cshlp.org/conten....prot5652.long), which reduces the cost of library prep to $10/library - much cheaper than the TruSeq kit!

    The authors explain that using the Craig indexing method (2008 - Nature Methods) is not suited to the HiSeq platform because the dominant 'T' signal from the Craig adapter T/A overhang interferes with its base calling/focusing system if it appears in the first 5 cycles (apparently this was not problematic for the GAII). Thus, they modified the length of their barcodes, to prevent having only T in a particular cycle. They used a mix of 4 and 5 nucleotide barcodes in their experiment.

    In a recent paper by Kircher et al (2011) - BMC Genomics, I read that the Illumina base caller uses two parameters (phasing/prephasing value and cross-talk matrix) to convert intensity values into bases. These estimates are often inaccurate when base composition is unbalanced. But Kicher et al claim that this method is not used for index reads: "for the index, parameters calculated for the preceding read are applied. Therefore for at least one lane in each run the base composition should be balanced over the thousands of clusters in the tile OR a separate control lane must be sequenced for estimating these base calling parameters." Does this mean that if I am running multiplexed paired-end samples on a HiSeq machine, I can use only 6-nt Craig adapters if I also include a Phix control library? Or is the problem still the same?

    I'm confused about this. Basically I am trying to figure out if I can side-step the process of designing my own 4-5nt barcodes since the 6nt ones are already available in the Craig paper. Does anyone know of any references which include sequences for shorter (or longer) barcodes that I could order from IDT, or have tips on how to design them?

    I found a thread on multiplexing with Illumina adapters/primers which was very helpful (relevant document attached), as it listed the sequences for Illumina adapters, multiplexing primers, etc. Which ones would be appropriate for paired-end multiplexing? I assume the multiplex ones listed in the document are for single-end reads.

    Thanks!

    Natalia
    Attached Files
  • NextGenSeq
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2009
    • 482

    #2
    I don't like the poly A enrichment. There are methods for ribosomal RNA depletion and subsequent random priming that are better IMHO.

    Comment

    • virusHIV
      Junior Member
      • Jul 2011
      • 4

      #3
      Originally posted by NextGenSeq View Post
      I don't like the poly A enrichment. There are methods for ribosomal RNA depletion and subsequent random priming that are better IMHO.
      May your give some more discussion why you don't like the poly A method?

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
        by SEQadmin2



        CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

        Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
        ...
        07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
        by SEQadmin2


        Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

        The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
        ...
        07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
        by SEQadmin2



        Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
        ...
        07-09-2026, 11:10 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 07:41 AM
      0 responses
      12 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
      0 responses
      26 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
      0 responses
      39 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
      0 responses
      25 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...