Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • marcowanger
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2008
    • 273

    #196
    Added a draft of wiki paper describing the SEQanswers community.

    2 purposes.

    (1) avoid self-plagiarism, (2) give insights for the writing
    Marco

    Comment

    • robs
      Senior Member
      • May 2010
      • 116

      #197
      I shifted a couple of things around and added some of the points into the text that were listed above. I think the text is getting in good shape, the only thing we still need is the figure and a few more stats.

      This means: ECO, we need your help with the SQLdump. :-)

      We might be over the word limit, but we can trim down the letter when we have added everything we want. (It will be easier to eliminate the weaker parts and select the most important ones.)

      Comment

      • adaptivegenome
        Super Moderator
        • Nov 2009
        • 436

        #198
        Originally posted by robs View Post
        This means: ECO, we need your help with the SQLdump. :-)
        I have this. Email me and I can share it with you.

        Comment

        • bioinfosm
          Senior Member
          • Jan 2008
          • 483

          #199
          got really tied up for the past couple months, but this is very interesting, and can look to contribute.

          I will start with scrolling through the thread, but feel free to PM me with any specifics..
          --
          bioinfosm

          Comment

          • robs
            Senior Member
            • May 2010
            • 116

            #200
            I added two figures to the gdoc and would like to get your comments and suggestions.

            How is the tag cloud coming along?

            Comment

            • robs
              Senior Member
              • May 2010
              • 116

              #201
              To save you the search for the gdoc link:

              Comment

              • marcowanger
                Senior Member
                • Dec 2008
                • 273

                #202
                Hi robs, great work. figure 1 is super nice, i see the new discussion(i suppose it means a thread?) still get steady increases after these years. While there are a slight drop /steady trend in the number of posts per month. Hey, on second thought I think the drop is due to bad curve fitting, the overall trend is still increasing. The rapid dropping in time between questions and answers support such argument. Obviously when ppl ask a question, normally they open a new post and thus the increase of new discussion.

                For figure 2, the raw data points for time between Q&A looks a bit messy. Should we hide them?
                Marco

                Comment

                • marcowanger
                  Senior Member
                  • Dec 2008
                  • 273

                  #203
                  Robs, remember to keep the data file and the scripts for graph generation. We still dont know if we have to change the color scheme or anything to suit journal's requirement. Great graphs!
                  Last edited by marcowanger; 11-12-2011, 09:27 PM. Reason: fix typo
                  Marco

                  Comment

                  • marcowanger
                    Senior Member
                    • Dec 2008
                    • 273

                    #204
                    Regarding the tag cloud, I think genericforms are having it done soon. Because there are already 2-3 figures potentially useful, I rather focus on the text. Just to avoid duplication of effort. Frankly, can we use all figures? Is there any #figures limitation? I think all these three would be worthwhile to be published. Thank you again robs!
                    Marco

                    Comment

                    • andreas.sjodin
                      Member
                      • Apr 2009
                      • 27

                      #205
                      I like the first figure too. The points should probably go away in second figure to make it less messy.

                      Comment

                      • robs
                        Senior Member
                        • May 2010
                        • 116

                        #206
                        Thanks for the comments.

                        I think, we can only add one figure for the letter (not sure though). I will wait until the tag cloud is done and maybe we can put all together into one figure.

                        If you have more ideas of what data might be interesting to plot, let me know and I will do my best to get the graph done.

                        Comment

                        • marcowanger
                          Senior Member
                          • Dec 2008
                          • 273

                          #207
                          Originally posted by robs View Post
                          Thanks for the comments.

                          I think, we can only add one figure for the letter (not sure though). I will wait until the tag cloud is done and maybe we can put all together into one figure.

                          If you have more ideas of what data might be interesting to plot, let me know and I will do my best to get the graph done.
                          Having these three would be fine enough I think...
                          Marco

                          Comment

                          • marcowanger
                            Senior Member
                            • Dec 2008
                            • 273

                            #208
                            Originally posted by robs View Post
                            Thanks for the comments.

                            I think, we can only add one figure for the letter (not sure though). I will wait until the tag cloud is done and maybe we can put all together into one figure.

                            If you have more ideas of what data might be interesting to plot, let me know and I will do my best to get the graph done.
                            Just thinking overlaying the tag cloud into the second figure to replace the raw dots. What do you guys think?
                            Marco

                            Comment

                            • robs
                              Senior Member
                              • May 2010
                              • 116

                              #209
                              Originally posted by marcowanger View Post
                              Just thinking overlaying the tag cloud into the second figure to replace the raw dots. What do you guys think?
                              If we want to make a single figure, then I would add the tag cloud data to the first one and ignore the second figure. We could keep the second figure for the longer version, if necessary. Or we can try to submit all figures that we will have at that point of submission and let them choose.

                              Comment

                              • marcowanger
                                Senior Member
                                • Dec 2008
                                • 273

                                #210
                                Originally posted by robs View Post
                                If we want to make a single figure, then I would add the tag cloud data to the first one and ignore the second figure. We could keep the second figure for the longer version, if necessary. Or we can try to submit all figures that we will have at that point of submission and let them choose.
                                Agree, it is good to have everything now.
                                Marco

                                Comment

                                Latest Articles

                                Collapse

                                • SEQadmin2
                                  Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
                                  by SEQadmin2



                                  CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

                                  Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
                                  ...
                                  07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
                                • SEQadmin2
                                  Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
                                  by SEQadmin2


                                  Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

                                  The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
                                  ...
                                  07-20-2026, 11:48 AM

                                ad_right_rmr

                                Collapse

                                News

                                Collapse

                                Topics Statistics Last Post
                                Started by SEQadmin2, 08-13-2026, 12:22 PM
                                0 responses
                                20 views
                                0 reactions
                                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                                Started by SEQadmin2, 08-11-2026, 10:35 AM
                                0 responses
                                18 views
                                0 reactions
                                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                                Started by SEQadmin2, 08-06-2026, 07:41 AM
                                0 responses
                                33 views
                                0 reactions
                                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                                Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
                                0 responses
                                50 views
                                0 reactions
                                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                                Working...