Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • xguo
    Member
    • Jul 2008
    • 48

    #1

    DEXSeq error

    Hi, there,
    I have been trying to use DEXSeq for alternative splicing analysis. We have RNA-Seq data for 9 pairs of normal/tumor samples and I'm doing paired analysis following example in the DEXSeq manual. Some errors I got when doing testGeneForDEU are as follows:

    Error in chol.default(XVX + lambda * I) :
    the leading minor of order 22 is not positive definite
    Error in chol.default(XVX + lambda * I) :
    the leading minor of order 22 is not positive definite
    In addition: Warning message:
    In testGeneForDEU(rumExons, formula0 = formula0, formula1 = formula1, :
    Error in fit1 for gene ENSG00000127928, exon E008: Error in chol.default(XVX + lambda * I) :

    Does anyone what these errors mean?

    thanks a bunch!
  • Wolfgang Huber
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2009
    • 109

    #2
    Dear Xguo

    Can you make sure that you are using a current version of DEXSeq (e.g., latest release http://www.bioconductor.org/packages...ml/DEXSeq.html)

    If the error persists, can you please post
    • the output of sessionInfo().
    • a minimal version of your R script that reproduces the error.
    • ideally, the input data that is necessary to run the script and reproduce the error.

    Best wishes
    Wolfgang
    Wolfgang Huber
    EMBL

    Comment

    • xguo
      Member
      • Jul 2008
      • 48

      #3
      Yes, I'm using the current version from bioconductor. I'll send some input data for you to reproduce the error.

      thanks for looking into it.

      best

      Comment

      • areyes
        Senior Member
        • Aug 2010
        • 165

        #4
        Hi xguo,

        Thanks a lot for your feedback!

        I gave a closer look to the error. The problem arises when calling glmnb.fit at the time of testing. If you look at the count values where the function fails, you will see that these are strange cases e.g. in exon E033 where the variance is really high.

        [CODE]
        > countTableForGene(rumExons, "ENSG00000007350")["E033",]
        1N.txt 2N.txt 1T.txt 2T.txt
        0 1 73 0
        [\CODE]

        These type of exons are not very likely to be called significant, so it should be harmless for your analysis. For the moment, DEXSeq version 1.1.3 now converts this error into a warning (just to avoid your screen to be full of this errors). Anyway, I will try to look for a smarter solution.

        How often do you see this error in your complete data set?

        Comment

        • xguo
          Member
          • Jul 2008
          • 48

          #5
          Thanks a lot for looking into the error and finding out the cause. As you said, it happens when the variation is too large. It doesn't happen very often.

          Do you have any plan to include reads mapped to splice junction in your analysis? DEXSeq currently uses reads mapped to exons only for differential exon usage testing. It seems to waste a lot of information by ignoring junction reads. It'll great if junction reads can also be included in the model or tested separately for cross-validation with exon reads.

          thanks a lot
          Xiang

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
            by SEQadmin2



            CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

            Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
            ...
            07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
            by SEQadmin2


            Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

            The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
            ...
            07-20-2026, 11:48 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 08-13-2026, 12:22 PM
          0 responses
          29 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 08-11-2026, 10:35 AM
          0 responses
          24 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 08-06-2026, 07:41 AM
          0 responses
          38 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
          0 responses
          51 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...