Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • delinquentme
    Member
    • Jul 2011
    • 12

    life sciences prep challenge -- thoughts?

    So I've been checking out the life sciences grand challenge : speed

    ( specifically this challenge is to reduce the prep time involved in the DNA of these machines from 10 to 4 hours )

    I'm looking at you guys as some of the best in the business as I don't have access to these machines.

    It seems that the most significant areas which could contribute to time cuts would be the PCR ( using preheated baths / microfluidics ) and prepping the input sample as to give the correct DNA concentration in the yields.

    I'm interested in what the folks around here have to say about how difficult this would be or if you'd happen to have recommendations as to what protocol to hack for the best returns on time reduction.
  • epistatic
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2009
    • 129

    #2
    For libraries that I generate, PCR is the quickest and easiest step. There is no real reason to overly complicate this step with microfluidics. A standard tcycler is cheap and found in every lab already.

    Most NGS DNA libraries:

    DNA -> fragment, clean up -> multiple enzyme steps with clean ups (End repair, dA tail, ligation, etc) -> size selection (gel, Pippin prep) -> quick low cycle PCR -> library validation with BioA, qPCR.

    The best and quickest method has been what Epicentre came up with, Nextera. DNA -> fragmentation to ligation in one quick and easy step -> quick low cycle PCR -> validation.

    It will be hard to get better and easier than that...

    Comment

    • delinquentme
      Member
      • Jul 2011
      • 12

      #3
      so lets break this down into steps

      1) Nextera. DNA
      This kit ? It mentions Illumina .. does it work for the Ion PGM?

      2) Fragmentation to ligation in one quick and easy step
      This sounds like its part of the kit? or a machine operation?

      3) quick low cycle PCR
      Did some googling and this doesn't seem like its run-of-the-mill PCR ... So do I need a special machine?

      4) validation
      I think this is the quantitation step ( the DNA / liquid ratio )?

      BTW ! thanks for digging back into these articles!
      Last edited by delinquentme; 12-09-2011, 09:46 AM. Reason: added thanks!

      Comment

      • NextGenSeq
        Senior Member
        • Apr 2009
        • 482

        #4
        The Nextera protocol gives very broad size ranges. The first time we ran it the library looked so strange we didn't even sequence it.

        Comment

        • delinquentme
          Member
          • Jul 2011
          • 12

          #5
          yeahh I think the PGM needs really specific lengths too?

          Comment

          • epistatic
            Senior Member
            • Mar 2009
            • 129

            #6
            Nextera was developed for 454, Illumina, et al. It could be used for the PGM, you do the library prep and do a size selection.

            For your question, you mention PCR. Do you mean PCR or the emulsion PCR?

            Comment

            • delinquentme
              Member
              • Jul 2011
              • 12

              #7
              so im lost right now is low-cycle PCR == emulsion PCR?

              Im 90% sure that the sequencer needs consensus sequences so it requires amplification .. but I was hoping I could get some specific PGM knowledge here with regards to what is needed

              Comment

              • epistatic
                Senior Member
                • Mar 2009
                • 129

                #8
                PCR is needed in the library prep and emPCR is needed to put the library onto the beads for sequencing.

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • GATTACAT
                  Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                  by GATTACAT
                  Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                  07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                  by SEQadmin2


                  I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                  Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                  06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
                0 responses
                6 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
                0 responses
                11 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
                0 responses
                19 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
                0 responses
                53 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...