Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Hkins552
    Member
    • Jun 2011
    • 18

    Removing Duplicates Scenario Exome Resequencing

    I am rethinking my well-established pipeline and trying to tweek it a bit and came across some controversy on the use of remove duplicates. I would like to propose an example scenario and my current understanding of Picard Tool's Mark Dups:

    At a given 5' loci (chr12:144230), two alleles are present (assume these are the first three nucleotides of 90bp reads):
    1) GAC #reads = 30 Highest Q score= 25
    2) GAA #reads = 8 Highest Q score= 26

    It is possible that some of the 30 reads of allele 1 are due to strand bias or pcr dup. and if visualizing this on an aligner, I would have some suspicion that the locus is heterozygous.

    If Mark Duplicates: Allele 2 is kept due to highest Q score, and thus there is loss of heterozygosity

    If no duplicate removal: Both alleles are kept, but the ration is not close enough to 50% to be called a het.

    Is my very rudimentary understanding of this tool correct and, if so, are there any other solutions?
    Does anyone have recommendations based on the fact that this particular project is exome resequencing at 50-75x average depth?)
  • Heisman
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 534

    #2
    With 75x coverage and I'm assuming paired end reads that has a size distribution with a standard deviation of at least 30bp, it is very unlikely for you to get multiple reads to pile up at the same exact locations without them being PCR duplicates. I would remove them for SNP calling.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    19 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    20 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    21 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    54 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...