Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ojy
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2011
    • 5

    Why Illumina reads may have uneven coverage?

    Why Illumina reads may have uneven coverage of the genome? Does it depend on GC content of the genome, and if so, then why and how exactly?
    I would appreciate any explanations or references (preferably so that a non-biology background person can understand)
  • stefanoberri
    Member
    • Jan 2010
    • 35

    #2
    Hi.

    We observed that read coverage is affected by GC content. Each sample, however, have a different bias and has to be corrected independently. We don't know exaclty why, and we suspect it is somehow linked to DNA quality and extraction method.

    We briefly mention CG bias in a recent paper. Read supplementary material for a few examples. Other articles (cited) mention GC content bias.

    Comment

    • pmiguel
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2008
      • 2328

      #3
      The evidence from full genome sequencing experiments is that the majority of bias comes from enrichment PCR. If you search, you can find references to this.

      We have seen this to be the case first hand. A standard TruSeq shotgun library of Deinococcus radiodurans (a ~70% GC genome) gave us very uneven coverage. Mapped back to the reference, the reads would vary from 100x coverage down to zero. However running the same library directly, without intervening enrichment PCR, resulted in quite even coverage.

      The down-side was that cluster densities we got from the non-amplified library were much lower than expected from qPCR titration. Subsequent documentation from Illumina leads me to believe that the TruSeq adapters have some modification that interferes with them binding to the flow cell. (Possibly LNAs? I don't know if LNAs are recalcitrant to NaOH denaturation.)

      --
      Phillip

      Comment

      • KevinLam
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2009
        • 204

        #4
        out of curiousity, your illumina reads are from GAIIx? or HiSeq? AFAIK, differences in the sample prep resulted in a different GC coverage profile even within the same companies' platform.
        anecdotal evidence only, no figures or anything.
        http://kevin-gattaca.blogspot.com/

        Comment

        • TonyBrooks
          Senior Member
          • Jun 2009
          • 303

          #5
          Hi Phillip
          I think Illumina have seen this problem with non-PCR'd libraries. They seem to think the problem arises with the Y adapter not dissociating properly in the NaOH denaturation step. Their suggested solution is to perform a one cycle PCR to completely linearise the libraries before qPCR and flowcell loading.
          Also, the Kapa library amplification module is supposedly better at generating even coverage (when compared to the Phusion Taq in the Illumina kits), although we haven't tried it yet.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:09 AM
          0 responses
          10 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
          0 responses
          19 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 12:03 PM
          0 responses
          26 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 11:40 AM
          0 responses
          21 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...