[ECO]

Hi everyone,

Eco mentioned that someone might have a complete postdump as an SQL file of all the forums. I would like to generate a few tag clouds of some of forums for a poster I will be present in a few weeks. Can someone hook me up with this file? [email protected]

BTW, I am not sure if ECO mind sharing the SQL dump not for the publication of SEQanswers. I think it would be better let him give the green light here or let him know?

Andrew, you have email.

Marco...as always, thanks for looking out for me!

[marcowanger]

We could include those numbers in parenthesis if you think it will be useful.

raw data included in NOTES section. And the claim is down-tuned according to the data (see the text for the changes made)

[robs]

Do you mind posting the current status of the article? This thread is still viewed by other people and we didn't post updates for the last days. Thanks!

[marcowanger]

Do you mind posting the current status of the article? This thread is still viewed by other people and we didn't post updates for the last days. Thanks!

Hi robs. Agree.

The MS is under unofficial review by 3 David's friends. 2 of them are clinical scientists / clinician.

For anyone interested, please take a look here

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4125508/SEQanswers/SeqAnswers-GM.20111229.2.OR.pdf

[adaptivegenome]

Sorry for the delay, the manuscript has been email to everyone. Perhaps someone (Marco?) can take the lead integrating comments/suggestions back into GDoc so we can continue to revise. I think the key things we need to do are:

1. Remove citations to websites. In most cases the citation was not necessary anyways and if it really is, we should find a peer-review citation.
2. Mention the 30+ papers that cited SEQanswers right way in the abstract.
3. Focus on the community. Its size and the members, of which many are key developers of software and methods for analyzing HTS data.

There are some word usage issues and a need to formalize the tone a bit, but I think we should be done soon. I would be in favor of writing the clearest and most concise abstract possible (~100 words). I will work on this today.

[marcowanger]

Sorry for the delay, the manuscript has been email to everyone. Perhaps someone (Marco?) can take the lead integrating comments/suggestions back into GDoc so we can continue to revise. I think the key things we need to do are:

1. Remove citations to websites. In most cases the citation was not necessary anyways and if it really is, we should find a peer-review citation.
2. Mention the 30+ papers that cited SEQanswers right way in the abstract.
3. Focus on the community. Its size and the members, of which many are key developers of software and methods for analyzing HTS data.

There are some word usage issues and a need to formalize the tone a bit, but I think we should be done soon. I would be in favor of writing the clearest and most concise abstract possible (~100 words). I will work on this today.

no problem. Thanks.

[severin]

Job forum tag cloud

How about also posting your poster here for us when it is complete and you have presented it? I am sure we are an interested audience.

For anyone that was interested in seeing the poster and the cloud tag I generated from the job forums. You can download it here.

http://gif.biotech.iastate.edu/Posters/PAG2012.pdf

[adaptivegenome]

I like this poster and the tag cloud looks great. Thanks for sharing.

[Joann]

SEQanswers published!

Published online Mar. 13, 2012

http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2012/03/13/bioinformatics.bts128.short?rss=1

[dan]

Massive congratulations everyone!

[adaptivegenome]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22419780