Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jon_Keats
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2010
    • 279

    #31
    I'm betting PGM will still have a place in the clinic, there just are not that many clinically relevant things to screen for on a mass scale. Though for some clinical assays like MRD assays or gene expression a bit higher read count would be nice and it is scary to hear that the PGM may be limited to around 10M sensors when the 318 is at 12M... sounds like a 320 chip is not coming... Argh
    Now I'm hoping our 4 PGM order didn't go out the door, what did Nick call it... The Osborne Effect

    Comment

    • singaporeseq
      Member
      • Jan 2010
      • 12

      #32
      So I guess it's the end of the scalability claim for PGM...unless you want to pay 200K for a Ion Proton....I don't imagine we'll be seeing a 320 chip ...

      Comment

      • BBoy
        Member
        • Oct 2010
        • 50

        #33
        Originally posted by 454newbie View Post
        Sorry to be pedantic, but the chip in the image clearly isn't square (measures up using the high tech method of "ruler against screen" with edge ratio of 2x1.6) that aside, back to the sensor size (I won't use "pixels" to describe them again, perhaps they should be called sexels (sensor elements)).

        Have just been back and reworked (post coffee) some of the sensor dimensions. Using images of sensor cross-section posted previously here, the sensors on the 318 chip are ~4.1um edge-to-edge, with ~3.4 um diameter wells, and ~0.7um well to well spacing.

        For Proton I, the sensor size (at ~170M per chip) must be ~2um2. Assuming a square sensor (not necessarily a good approximation, but let's go with it for now), the sensor width would be ~1.4um. If the ratio of well width to sensor spacing is preserved relative to the 318 chip, then the well would be ~1.16um wide, and the intersensor spacing would be ~0.25 um.

        For Proton II, the sensor size (at ~660M per chip) must be ~0.5um2. Assuming a square sensor (still probably not the best approximation...), the sensor width would be ~0.7um. If the ratio of well width to sensor spacing is preserved relative to the 318 chip, then the well would be 0.58um wide, and the intersensor spacing would be 0.125 um.

        This all assumes that there will be no increase in cross-talk between wells or sensors as the density increases.

        Even with this best case scenario, the well width on the Proton II will be ~0.6um, which would require the use of 0.2-0.3um diameter beads. Perhaps that isn't so unreasonable?
        4x increase in sensel count without an increase in die size in under a year (if the current propaganda is to be believed) does not sound very plausible. Having said that, it is not completely out of the realm of possibility.

        Perhaps given Ion's published sensor response (mV/pH, somewhere in their Nature paper if I recall correctly) can someone back-calculate a lower limit on the bead size? You need to generate enough protons at each flush cycle to to swing the pH by a measurable amount (a few mV, I would imagine).

        Comment

        • DICER
          Member
          • Jan 2012
          • 12

          #34
          Originally posted by ECO View Post
          Another pic of chip...


          <snip>
          Can anyone read or figure out the coding tag of the chip? Is that already P 6 or are my eyes playing up?

          BTW is there going to be special centrifuges?

          Pixel, Sensel, Hexel, Hexwels....

          H+ e- X el-ectronics
          Last edited by DICER; 01-11-2012, 04:31 AM.

          Comment

          • tlking
            Junior Member
            • Nov 2009
            • 2

            #35
            Originally posted by nickloman View Post
            I am interested to know how Ion Torrent PGM customers feel about this news...
            As an owner of an Ion Torrent PGM, I am excited to know that Life Tech has put resources into expanding the technology. We are very pleased with the output from our PGM and OneTouch.

            Comment

            • ymc
              Senior Member
              • Mar 2010
              • 496

              #36
              If ion can do a 30x genome in 3 hours, doesn't that mean their throughput is higher than HiSeq 2500 by 7x???

              Comment

              • epistatic
                Senior Member
                • Mar 2009
                • 129

                #37
                With that many wells, how many beads will you need to input into the emulsions? My rep said it requires a new one-touch, I wonder if they will have to move to bag emPCR and use the SOLiD's EZ bead system to make that many beads. Input beads * 8-10% enriched = >165-660M beads to load onto the chip? That will be a lot of Taq. I wonder what sample prep will add to the $1K price.

                Speed of getting that much data will be quite useful, hope the prep has similar improvements.

                Comment

                • hamiguo
                  Junior Member
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 2

                  #38
                  avarage RL 390bp,longest 700bp, i’ve seen this file

                  Comment

                  • gringer
                    David Eccles (gringer)
                    • May 2011
                    • 845

                    #39
                    Pixel, Sensel, Hexel, Hexwels....
                    Sensel and photosites are used in digital cameras:




                    Other possible words playing on these names: hydrosites, protosites, ionocells, ionosites

                    Comment

                    • aleferna
                      Senior Member
                      • Sep 2009
                      • 121

                      #40
                      Originally posted by TonyBrooks View Post
                      No wonder Life are selling the original PGM's off at a dirt cheap price.
                      Says who, we just got a tender for a PGM last week... seems price discounts do not come to Europe that easily...

                      Comment

                      • aleferna
                        Senior Member
                        • Sep 2009
                        • 121

                        #41
                        Question, how do you fragment the library, are you using sonication or the IonShear. We are trying to buy a MiSeq/PGM but we can use Nextera with the MiSeq, with the PGM do you need a sonicator? I mean requiring a Covaris would certainly put the PGM out of our reach...

                        Comment

                        • DICER
                          Member
                          • Jan 2012
                          • 12

                          #42
                          Originally posted by gringer View Post
                          Sensel and photosites are used in digital cameras:




                          Other possible words playing on these names: hydrosites, protosites, ionocells, ionosites
                          protoxels, protonels...

                          perhaps the Ion One Touch disappears in October?
                          Last edited by DICER; 01-13-2012, 04:09 AM.

                          Comment

                          • nickloman
                            Senior Member
                            • Jul 2009
                            • 355

                            #43
                            They announced a OneTouch for Proton.

                            Comment

                            • nickloman
                              Senior Member
                              • Jul 2009
                              • 355

                              #44
                              Ion Torrent are keen to point out that PGM users (current or prospective) will get a decent discount on the Proton (nearly the entire cost of the PGM) if they "upgrade", plus they get to keep their PGM. Which seems like a fair deal.

                              Comment

                              • epistatic
                                Senior Member
                                • Mar 2009
                                • 129

                                #45
                                The Ion Proton Sequencer, $149,000
                                Ion Proton OneTouch and Proton Server, $95,000
                                Service Contract (per year), $30,000 (rep estimate, first year free)
                                Total Five Year Investment, $364,000


                                The cost isn't as low as the PGM but the most impressive part is the $1K all inclusive sequencing price. I thought the $1K was just the price for the chip and the sequencing reagents, our rep says it includes everything from Ion to do DNA -> library -> emPCR -> sequencing -> fastq if doing a standard shotgun prep. It is fair that an RNA kit or capture kit would cost more.

                                $1,000 run price "does include library (if fragment) prep, template prep, sequencing consumables and reagents (pretty much everything except basic lab supplies)"

                                Now how to figure out what mark up will be needed to pay the service contract and staff to run it.

                                Comment

                                Latest Articles

                                Collapse

                                • SEQadmin2
                                  Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                                  by SEQadmin2


                                  I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                                  Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                                  06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
                                • SEQadmin2
                                  From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
                                  by SEQadmin2


                                  Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


                                  The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
                                  ...
                                  06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

                                ad_right_rmr

                                Collapse

                                News

                                Collapse

                                Topics Statistics Last Post
                                Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 05:37 AM
                                0 responses
                                5 views
                                0 reactions
                                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
                                0 responses
                                16 views
                                0 reactions
                                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
                                0 responses
                                49 views
                                0 reactions
                                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
                                0 responses
                                109 views
                                0 reactions
                                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                                Working...