Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • TonyBrooks
    Senior Member
    • Jun 2009
    • 303

    #1

    Expired flowcell

    We have a couple of expired flowcells in our fridge (manufactured 13 months ago). Has anyone here run a flowcell that is past it's best before date and got decent data? How far expired was it? I'm seriously anti "throw things away" and I'd like to use it.

    I'm wondering if it'll be the same as Affymetrix arrays (which are still fine years after expiry).
  • NextGenSeq
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2009
    • 482

    #2
    We ran a GAIIX flowcell that was ~2months expired and it worked terribly.

    Comment

    • simonandrews
      Simon Andrews
      • May 2009
      • 870

      #3
      How expensive is it to get as far as the first base report with a flowcell? If the reagent cost to that stage isn't too bad you could try it and just bail out if the clusters look poor. As long as your cluster generation is OK I'd think that the rest of the sequencing would be OK from that point.

      Comment

      • behavin
        Member
        • Oct 2011
        • 11

        #4
        We had a HiSeq v1 flow cell that was WITHIN its expiration window (I think it was about 8 months old) and when we ran it the outside edges of each lane looked horrible, intensities were low across the board, and the Q30's were pretty bad compared to what we're used to.

        Comment

        • NextGenSeq
          Senior Member
          • Apr 2009
          • 482

          #5
          That sounds like their old manufacturing problem. Illumina had bad lots of flowcells in 2010 where the edges had a problem with the oligo deposition.

          Comment

          • MRSeq
            Member
            • May 2009
            • 10

            #6
            Hello, I have nothing to contribute, but I am also very interested in that question. Collaborating facility has a HiSeQ 2000 flowcell (old type) that is 6 months expired and would let us play with it for free. But what should we expect? Terrible problems or normal quality? We have to decide within days should we risk good samples and use it as a purely technical exercise? I would love to hear from somebody with experience with "expired" HiSeQ flowcell.

            Comment

            • TonyBrooks
              Senior Member
              • Jun 2009
              • 303

              #7
              Surely if it's free you should just give it a go. Keep the denatured hyb solution and if it looks terrible, you can still repeat the sequencing.
              I can't see any reason why it would generate incorrect information. You may just get more technical issues, such as low cluster numbers or low quality scores. If anything is really bad it should get removed by the filters before it hits any analysis pipeline.

              Comment

              • obiwan
                Junior Member
                • Feb 2012
                • 1

                #8
                Yes, we've run a single-end flow cell for the GAIIx with good results. Its expiration date was 8/20/2010 and we ran it in April 2011. More recently (Jan 2012) we ran another flow cell with the same expiration date. I can't say qualitatively that it was good (the PhiX lane failed), but I did see clusters in the other 7 lanes.

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • SEQadmin2
                  Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                  by SEQadmin2



                  Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                  Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                  ...
                  10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
                  by SEQadmin2


                  Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

                  We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
                  ...
                  09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
                0 responses
                14 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
                0 responses
                21 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-13-2026, 09:56 AM
                0 responses
                19 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
                0 responses
                27 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...