Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • zhongj
    Member
    • Dec 2011
    • 13

    Beg for latest version of SOAPdenovo correction tool before assembly

    Hi guys,
    In AllPath-LG paper, “High-quality draft assemblies of mammalian genomes from massively parallel sequence data”, supplemental information, page4, it mentions
    “Next read correction was done on the fragment pair reads in two steps via the modules KmerFreq and Corrector. The SOAP authors provided new error correction code along with the exact parameters to use:”
    kmer_freq_pfile reads.in -k 17 -f 1 -t 48 -p mouse
    correct_error_pread mouse.freq.gz reads.in -k 17 -x 8 -r 50 -l
    10 -c 5 -p mouse -f 1 -j 1 -t 48

    But on the BGI official web, there is only version 1.00 which was published in 2009. I had tried to mail to [email protected], but never succeed. Could SOAP authors or anyone kindly send the latest version of error correction tool to me? My email is [email protected], thank you very much!

    BTW, I have a question about error correction tool version 1.00, about Corrector module:
    -k [int] start of kmer frequence cutoff [default 5]
    -e [int] end of kmer frequence cutoff [default 5]
    Does “start of kmer frequence cutoff [default 5]” means low frequency (<5) 17 mers were edited to the closely similar high-frequency 17- mers? What does “end of kmer frequence cutoff [default 5]” means?

    Thanks in advance!
    Best,
    Josh
  • Bukowski
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2010
    • 388

    #2
    Perhaps they were referring to the 1.05 release in Feb 2011 rather than the 1.04 release that was released in December 2009?

    Comment

    • zhongj
      Member
      • Dec 2011
      • 13

      #3
      Thank you for your reply. I mean the additional reads Correction module, rathaer than SOAPdenovo software. I have SOAPdenovo 1.05 version alredy.

      Originally posted by Bukowski View Post
      Perhaps they were referring to the 1.05 release in Feb 2011 rather than the 1.04 release that was released in December 2009?

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      9 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      13 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      20 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      54 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...