Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sissi
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2012
    • 5

    best RNAseq mapping tool for bacteria

    Hi,

    I am new to NGS data and am trying to find the best mapping tool for bacterial genome. My data consists of FASTQ files for paired end RNA-seq on Illumina. I have downloaded the reference genome from NCBI website (fasta file).
    So far I have identified a few softwares (MAQ, Tophat, BWA, Glimmer, SHRIMP...), but I don't know which one to choose.

    Thank you for your help!

    Regards,
    S
  • swbarnes2
    Senior Member
    • May 2008
    • 910

    #2
    Bacteria have almost no introns, so you are just mapping to the genome. And since the genome is so small, you can use as slow an algorithm as you like, it'll still be done pretty fast.

    As long as it'll output .bam files, you'll probably be fine.

    Comment

    • swaraj
      Member
      • Feb 2012
      • 50

      #3
      For aligning RNA-seq reads consider the following points

      1) Paired-end or single-end sequencing?
      2) spliced reads?
      4) interested in finding novel transcripts?

      I suggest subread (http://subread.sourceforge.net/) as it is fast, reported to be accurate and integrates within R environment.

      Comment

      • sissi
        Junior Member
        • Mar 2012
        • 5

        #4
        Hi,
        Thx for your answers.

        It is for pair end sequencing data with 75bp library.
        I will be looking at SNPs and differential expression data.
        I don't know exactly if there are many spliced read, but my guess would be very little as it's a bacteria.

        I read a few papers on the subject and it seems that the quality of the reference genome is also important. How do I know if that condition is verified?

        I will have a look at the R script
        Thank you!
        Last edited by sissi; 03-05-2012, 05:58 AM.

        Comment

        • Hobbe
          Member
          • Apr 2010
          • 29

          #5
          Shrimp2 is easy to use and runs very well on several cores if you have them, so it is fairly quick. In my experience, it maps well too.

          Comment

          • swaraj
            Member
            • Feb 2012
            • 50

            #6
            Shrimp2 is a good choice for bacterial genomes. For the genome quality you have to look into the publication which reported the genome.

            Comment

            • sissi
              Junior Member
              • Mar 2012
              • 5

              #7
              Thanks a lot.

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
                by SEQadmin2



                Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
                ...
                07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
                by SEQadmin2



                Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

                There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
                07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
              • GATTACAT
                Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                by GATTACAT
                Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:26 AM
              0 responses
              15 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
              0 responses
              28 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
              0 responses
              16 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
              0 responses
              33 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...