Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Giorgio C
    Member
    • Oct 2010
    • 89

    Comparison of two sets of miRNAs

    Hi all,

    i have two sets A and B of miRNAs. How i can make a comparison of them considering common elements and not ?

    Is there any tool that makes this type of comparison ?

    Thanks in advance for your help
  • NicoBxl
    not just another member
    • Aug 2010
    • 264

    #2
    which type of data ? explain a little bit more about your problem

    Comment

    • Giorgio C
      Member
      • Oct 2010
      • 89

      #3
      There are two sets of miRNAs one coming out from a leaf and the other from the flower of the same Orchid. I have to know what are the differences between these two sets:
      Elements in common and not. They are both in fasta format and in replicate (trimmed, filtered and collapsed with galaxy tools) originally coming out from a 454 platform.

      they apper like this:

      >1-8490
      ACGTCACTCTCTCC..
      >2-7990
      CGTCAATCGCCTCC..
      >3-6696
      ACGTGCACTGCATG..

      the first number is the Id , the second represents the number of occurences.

      I need to evidence what are the differences fromt he two sets. Do you have any advice ??

      tnx

      Comment

      • NicoBxl
        not just another member
        • Aug 2010
        • 264

        #4
        Ok


        First annotate your reads : align them against mirbase databse (with blats per example) and then count for each miR, the number of reads.

        After that in R create a matrix : each line represent one miR, each column a sample. Then use DESeq or edgeR for the DE analysis

        Comment

        • Giorgio C
          Member
          • Oct 2010
          • 89

          #5
          thank you very much for your fast reply. Is a problem that most of the miRNAs are novel and have no match with the database ??

          Comment

          • NicoBxl
            not just another member
            • Aug 2010
            • 264

            #6
            maybe try miRDeep before DE analysis

            Comment

            • Giorgio C
              Member
              • Oct 2010
              • 89

              #7
              Yes, i'v just done it with mirDeep but being this type of Orhichid not yet annotated i have a lot of no matching elements

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
                by SEQadmin2


                Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

                The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
                ...
                07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
                by SEQadmin2



                Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
                ...
                07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
                by SEQadmin2



                Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

                There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
                07-08-2026, 05:17 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
              0 responses
              15 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-23-2026, 11:41 AM
              0 responses
              15 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-20-2026, 11:10 AM
              0 responses
              23 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
              0 responses
              37 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...