Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Brace
    Junior Member
    • May 2008
    • 7

    How to fetch any older version ACCs from NCBI using programming language?

    For example: I want to get the genomic coordinates of NR_046018.1, which has been updated and removed from the current release of NCBI databases.
    Then,how can I retrieve the record using EUtils like API?

    Or maybe, anyone can supply another fresh way to deal with this kind of work?
    Any suggestions?

    Thanks in advance.
  • Brace
    Junior Member
    • May 2008
    • 7

    #2
    Saddly, no answer, then maybe I should do it another way, does anyone know where can I find an accession number dependent version update notes on NCBI?

    e.g. NM_001604.4 -> NM_001604.5 ... anything changed?

    Comment

    • cliffbeall
      Senior Member
      • Jan 2010
      • 144

      #3
      In BioPython you can specify the accession with the decimal points and get the two different records:
      Code:
      >>> from Bio import Entrez
      >>> Entrez.email = '[email protected]'
      >>> handle1 = Entrez.efetch(db="nucleotide", id = "NR_046018.1", rettype = "gb")
      >>> print handle1.read()
      ...older version - sequence ends gtttct...
      >>> handle2 = Entrez.efetch(db="nucleotide", id = "NR_046018.2", rettype = "gb")
      >>> print handle2.read()
      ...newer version - sequence ends gtttctg...
      That is the only eutils wrapper I have experience with but I would think anything would work like that.

      Comment

      • Brace
        Junior Member
        • May 2008
        • 7

        #4
        Thanks cliffbeall
        I understand that EUtils can fetch older version of ACC from nucl db of NCBI, even in
        genbank or xml format, but I cannot find the genomic coords from any of the returned files.
        The genomic coords of current version of ACC can be obtain by esearch & efetch from db:gene element:Gene-commentary_genomic-coords easily, But this's not available for older version.

        I know that the final solution is to run `splign` from sequences, but it's rather a tough way for whole genome and thousand of genes.

        Any other suggestions?

        Comment

        • cliffbeall
          Senior Member
          • Jan 2010
          • 144

          #5
          Sorry, I guess I misunderstood the question.

          I don't know how to do what you want, it has to do with links between nucl and gene databases.

          Comment

          • Brace
            Junior Member
            • May 2008
            • 7

            #6
            It's not your fault, my misleading indeed.
            Thanks cliffbeall.
            Waiting for any further suggestions ...

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
              by SEQadmin2



              Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
              ...
              07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
              by SEQadmin2



              Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

              There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
              07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:26 AM
            0 responses
            12 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
            0 responses
            25 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
            0 responses
            16 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
            0 responses
            33 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...