Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • farrel75
    Member
    • May 2012
    • 11

    Let's Talk About TruSeq

    Hi everyone,
    My lab and I are in the process of taking our maiden voyage on the MiSeq and we are trying to make the process as cost effective as possible. We are considering having me do the library prep rather than have it sent to the core facility. We need more than the 12 barcodes we get from the A kit but we don't need the entire B kit.
    So the question is: What about TruSeq? Can we keep it in the fridge for an extended amount of time? Is it a one time use thing? Any suggestions??
    Thanks!
  • SS00
    PhD Student
    • Jun 2012
    • 33

    #2
    Do you mean storage of the kit? You can store the kit in the freezer (not the fridge!) until the expiry date which is written on the top of the box.

    If you are not going to use the whole kit at once you need to aliquot End Repair Mix, A-tailing Mix, and all the Controls (if you use them) into single use aliquots to avoid freeze thaw.

    Once you have done this, it should be fine to revisit your kit as many times as you need.

    Comment

    • TonyBrooks
      Senior Member
      • Jun 2009
      • 303

      #3
      We used a TruSeq RNA kit that was 9 months passed use-by date and it still produced excellent libraries. We followed SS00's advice and aliquoted the reactions out into smaller volumes when the kit arrived and stored everything at the recommended temperature (written on each individual tube).
      We don't use Ampure beads that are out of date because we've found they don't keep so well.
      There are also alternative prep kits that are supplied in smaller pack sizes which may be more suitable if you don't want the hassle of aliquoting everything out (Bioo, NEB). Personally, I'm not so keen on the TruSeq DNA kits as size selection is a real problem. The TruSeq RNA kits are excellent though.

      Comment

      • Rocketknight
        Member
        • Sep 2011
        • 86

        #4
        @TonyBrooks What size-selection problems have you had with the Truseq DNA kits? Do other kits use different size-selection methods?

        Comment

        • TonyBrooks
          Senior Member
          • Jun 2009
          • 303

          #5
          We've never gotten the post ligation gel purification to run properly. Libraries run too slowly with EthBr and too fast with SYBR. A 400-500 excision either gives us libraries >600bp or 300-400bp. We could probably optimise it, but we don't have the time.
          We didn't see this problem with the older Illumina PE kit or with NEB kits. I also think, the latest NEB kit has a protocol for gel-free selection, giving libraries ~ 350bp. It's not as tight as gel urification, but takes minutes, not hours.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
            by SEQadmin2



            Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
            ...
            07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
            by SEQadmin2



            Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

            There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
            07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:26 AM
          0 responses
          13 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
          0 responses
          26 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
          0 responses
          16 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
          0 responses
          33 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...