Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • swNGS
    Member
    • Nov 2011
    • 83

    Illumina Nextera for exome library prep versus sonicated approachs

    Hi

    Does anyone have any experience comparing exome library prep coverage results using Illumina's Nextera library prep which relies on enzymatic 'tagmentation' (transposon-mediated addition of indexes and adapters and fragmentation) compared to alternate approaches that rely on sonication such as Agilent SureSelect or Illumina's TruSeq?

    Thanks
  • VanessaS
    Member
    • Nov 2009
    • 49

    #2
    I'm also curious about this. We are being strongly encouraged to use nextera over Truseq for exome sequencing and I'd like to get some feedback before we jump in. My understanding is that the lovely pricing we currently enjoy for the TruSeq Exome kits will be going away after the first of the year, but that the Nextera kits will remain affordable.

    Comment

    • ECO
      --Site Admin--
      • Oct 2007
      • 1360

      #3
      Moving to sample prep. Try to hit the right forum.

      Comment

      • dottomarco
        Member
        • Jul 2009
        • 32

        #4
        What is your esperience with the Nextera Exome kit so far?
        Are you getting the same % of reads on targett? I am mostly interested about the coverage that I can get using these libraries compared to the TrueSeq exome enrichment libraries (62 Mb target) I have used so far.

        If you have any suggestion when approaching Exome library prep with the Nextera' protocols, it will be much appreciated.

        Marco

        Comment

        • james hadfield
          Moderator
          Cambridge, UK
          Community Forum
          • Feb 2008
          • 224

          #5
          We've run 96 rapid-exomes but not done the direct comparison to TruSeq etal. The on-target rates were good, duplication rate was a bit higher than we'd previously seen and at some level I'd say the exome is not as "good". This is all relative though.

          The biggest advantage from our perspective is the ability to perform exome analysis using 50ng of DNA routinely. Nextera also removes the need for any fragmentation or sonication making the lab work easier. I'd argue these workflow improvements need to be considered aginst other metrics.

          You can only assesses the quality in light of your own very specific needs.

          I'm sure comparisons will follow but they'll be out of date upon publication. I'd say just dive in a do an experiment, your almost certain to find something interesting!

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
            by SEQadmin2



            Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
            ...
            07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
            by SEQadmin2



            Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

            There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
            07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
          0 responses
          15 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
          0 responses
          29 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
          0 responses
          16 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
          0 responses
          33 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...