Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • crh
    Member
    • Dec 2009
    • 46

    #1

    bowtie memory warning

    Hi

    I'm mapping solid reads using bowtie and received the following warnings for MANY reads. Mapping % is very low as well.
    Am I running out of memory?

    command line:
    bowtie -C -S -k 3 --best --un unmapped_list genome_index -f seq.csfasta -Q seq.qual bowtie.sam



    Warning: Exhausted best-first chunk memory for read 301_728_1008_F3 (patid 11858997); skipping read

    # reads processed: 19323816
    # reads with at least one reported alignment: 4408352 (22.81%)
    # reads that failed to align: 14915464 (77.19%)
    Reported 5326165 alignments to 1 output stream(s)

    Thanks

    charles
  • kopardev
    Member
    • Oct 2011
    • 19

    #2
    I get similar warnings when I use paired end data. But if I align read1 and read2 separately, I do not get any warnings. Solutions/pointers are appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Vishal

    Comment

    • gntc
      Member
      • Feb 2011
      • 17

      #3
      Yes, I believe you are running out of memory. If you use --chunkmbs 200 you should stop getting the warning. This may help improve your alignment statistics.

      Comment

      • kopardev
        Member
        • Oct 2011
        • 19

        #4
        In fact, I have tried using --chunkmbs 1000 and still managed to get these errors ... only for paired-end data though.

        Comment

        • gntc
          Member
          • Feb 2011
          • 17

          #5
          Try higher I guess. 200 worked for me when working with non-paired end data.

          Comment

          • crh
            Member
            • Dec 2009
            • 46

            #6
            bowtie memory warning

            All

            Thanks for the advice:

            Using --chunkmbs 200 eliminated the memory warnings.

            I'm still not mapping a significant fraction of the reads. I'm going to trim the unmapped colorspace reads from 3'end to see if I can get any of these to map - other suggestions?

            bowtie -C -S -k 3 --best


            # reads processed: 19323816
            # reads with at least one reported alignment: 4408352 (22.81%)
            # reads that failed to align: 14915464 (77.19%)
            Reported 5326165 alignments to 1 output stream(s)

            Comment

            • gladexp
              Junior Member
              • Mar 2012
              • 3

              #7
              Bowtie: Memory error warning

              Same as the quoted question. When I run the Bowtie command as below to generate SAM with the 1 best hit from fasta input, it has such warning messages,

              $ bowtie -f -S -m 1 -k 1 --best h_sapiens_37_asm Input.fa > Output.sam
              ------------------
              Warning: Exhausted best-first chunk memory for read seq_5023_1 (patid 5023); skipping read
              Warning: Exhausted best-first chunk memory for read seq_5041_1 (patid 5041); skipping read
              Warning: Exhausted best-first chunk memory for read seq_20071_1 (patid 20071); skipping read
              ......
              ------------------

              Which flag options should I use?

              Many thanks.

              Ben


              Originally posted by crh View Post
              Hi

              I'm mapping solid reads using bowtie and received the following warnings for MANY reads. Mapping % is very low as well.
              Am I running out of memory?

              command line:
              bowtie -C -S -k 3 --best --un unmapped_list genome_index -f seq.csfasta -Q seq.qual bowtie.sam



              Warning: Exhausted best-first chunk memory for read 301_728_1008_F3 (patid 11858997); skipping read

              # reads processed: 19323816
              # reads with at least one reported alignment: 4408352 (22.81%)
              # reads that failed to align: 14915464 (77.19%)
              Reported 5326165 alignments to 1 output stream(s)

              Thanks

              charles

              Comment

              • jay
                Member
                • Feb 2009
                • 12

                #8
                I had this problem as well. I tried --chunkmbs 200 as well, and it didn't help, but --chunkmbs 2000 seems like it might have fixed the bug being reported, but I am still getting very low alignmment proportions (5% of reads).

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • SEQadmin2
                  Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                  by SEQadmin2



                  Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                  Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                  ...
                  10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
                  by SEQadmin2


                  Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

                  We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
                  ...
                  09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
                0 responses
                17 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
                0 responses
                26 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-13-2026, 09:56 AM
                0 responses
                22 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
                0 responses
                27 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...