Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • kcchan
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2012
    • 186

    qPCR on Nextera XT Libraries

    Has anyone had any luck trying to quantify Nextera XT libraries using qPCR? I have tried it twice with no success. I have been able to quantify TruSeq libraries and they have been working just right. It looks like primer sequences are correct, so I don't know what could be causing the problem.
  • pmiguel
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2008
    • 2328

    #2
    Yes, we got a library, already normalized and eluted as single strands using the kit protocol. The protocol called for us to just heat denature it, snap cool and immediately load into the reagent cassette for sequencing. But we did a KAPA qPCR kit (not the Illumina-specific kit, just the generic one) using normal flow cell oligo primers. The result looked fairly reasonable, so we proceeded. Basically just did what the protocol asked. (Okay, I spiked in phiX out of paranoia -- but otherwise the followed the instructions on the box.)
    Worked okay.
    --
    Phillip

    Comment

    • kcchan
      Senior Member
      • Jul 2012
      • 186

      #3
      You've had luck with the bead normalization? I've never been able to get it to work. Anytime I use the beads I get a uneven distribution of up to 50%. That's why I'm relying on qPCR to quantify my library.

      Comment

      • pmiguel
        Senior Member
        • Aug 2008
        • 2328

        #4
        You get better than 0.5x variation in read numbers using qPCR? Like you have several samples in a pool and the lowest one gave you 20 million and the highest gave you 30 million? That would be close enough to perfect to satisfy me!

        I did not do the bead normalization myself -- we just got a Nextera XT pool from a customer and ran it. There were >20 different index pairs in it. I generally call it a "win" if the lowest sample gives > 1/2 the number of reads as the highest sample. So by that criteria, it was good. Actually, if I remember correctly, it was better than that.

        --
        Phillip

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
          by SEQadmin2



          Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
          ...
          07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
          by SEQadmin2



          Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

          There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
          07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
        0 responses
        15 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
        0 responses
        29 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
        0 responses
        16 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
        0 responses
        34 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...