Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • molecules
    MU Informatics Research Core F
    • Oct 2010
    • 6

    #16
    STACKS should be fine.

    At the GBS Workshop I attended at Cornell (with speakers including Dr. Buckler), we were told that any tool you can use to analyze RAD data, you can also use to analyze GBS data. So there should be no problem using STACKS for your GBS data.

    Also, last I checked bwa and bowtie2 were the aligners mentioned in GBS training by the Buckler group.

    disclaimer: I have no experience with STACKS. As part of the Maize Diversity Project, which Ed Buckler heads, I use the Buckler GBS pipeline to work with GBS/RAD maize data.

    Comment

    • Geneus
      Member
      • Dec 2010
      • 60

      #17
      Originally posted by molecules View Post
      STACKS should be fine.

      At the GBS Workshop I attended at Cornell (with speakers including Dr. Buckler), we were told that any tool you can use to analyze RAD data, you can also use to analyze GBS data. So there should be no problem using STACKS for your GBS data.

      Also, last I checked bwa and bowtie2 were the aligners mentioned in GBS training by the Buckler group.

      disclaimer: I have no experience with STACKS. As part of the Maize Diversity Project, which Ed Buckler heads, I use the Buckler GBS pipeline to work with GBS/RAD maize data.
      Yes...you are correct...Bowtie2 is what they are using in the GBS pipeline...I got confirmation of that. His lab does however use Novoalign for their WGS.

      Comment

      • jage.g
        Junior Member
        • Apr 2013
        • 1

        #18
        Gbs

        Hi
        my name is Jorge and I student of Biotecnology engineering in Chile. I am think to make a survey of genotyping of Nothofagus dombelyi, and I need to use GBS but I'm not sure which protocol to use, use only one or two restriction enzyme restriction enzymes which are the advantages and disadvantages.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        7 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        12 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        20 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        54 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...