Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • pulikoti
    Junior Member
    • Oct 2012
    • 2

    Comparing two proteomes/genomes!

    Hi all,

    I need suggestions on how to compare two genomes, find out genes that are common between the two and those that are unique. So far i've done a pairwise alignment of each gene in genome1 with the genes in genome2 and vice versa. Kindly help. Thanks
  • westerman
    Rick Westerman
    • Jun 2008
    • 1104

    #2
    I think you will need to tell us more specifically what type of help you need. Since you have the pairwise alignments of each gene in each genome then it should simple to count up the ones in 'common'. Of course 'common' is a nebulous term -- what level of homology and length do you require.

    Comment

    • A_Morozov
      Member
      • Feb 2011
      • 40

      #3
      For start, you can just call pairs of genes with alignment score above certain treshold common, and call those that don't have such pairing unique. This is grossly oversimplified approach, because unless you have some really small genomes (like viral or organellar) some genes are gonna have more than one copy. Are these the same or different or you? And what if some genes are indeed of the same function but derived from distant groups eg via HGT? And are you gonna compare anything other than gene content?
      I agree with westerman - you need to tell us more about what exactly question your project must answer if you want us to give valuable advice.

      Comment

      • Joann
        Senior Member
        • Oct 2008
        • 230

        #4
        It would be interesting to see what alternative annotations besides alignment score there might be between two evolutionarily diverse genomes that interact, say, in an ecological niche situation

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:05 AM
        0 responses
        7 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        28 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        27 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        26 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...