Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • geneart
    Member
    • Sep 2011
    • 42

    galaxy - illumina data analysis

    Hello folks,
    I am trying to use galaxy to run my analysis on my illumina data. I uploaded data into history and ran fastq groomer on it. I waited a day and still the job shows "waiting to be run" I have total 20GB data across 57 data sets:
    Just with the first data run , I am getting that message and still not changed the status! Any idea what is happening and when I could expect it to be done???I have written to galaxy people as well but any suggestions will help.

    Also is there a way to find out the datascore type of illumina if it is solexa or illumina 1.3-1.7 or 1.8+ ???
    Thanks
    geneart.
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    Galaxy has become a victim of their own success. Too many people like you around the world trying to use the main galaxy site. Of late advice from galaxy support has been to use an amazon cloud instance of galaxy (at your expense) if you have an immediate need for data analysis. Not much you can do but wait for the logjam to clear at main galaxy site.

    If that data is your own can't you check with the facility that generated the data as to what format the quality values are in. You could also run a tool like "fastqc" (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.a...ojects/fastqc/) on one of the files and it should tell you about the quality format of the data.

    Comment

    • JackieBadger
      Senior Member
      • Mar 2009
      • 385

      #3
      Install a local instance of Galaxy on your computer and upload the data files as Admin. Then you can process much faster. The Galaxy install is straight forward with good instructions.
      Also, depending n what you want to do, its much faster using the original package outside of Galaxy in command line.

      Comment

      • geneart
        Member
        • Sep 2011
        • 42

        #4
        Thanks Genomax and JackieBadger ! I will definitely try the fastqc, and then run the rest of my data on galaxy local. Appreciate ur time

        Comment

        • geneart
          Member
          • Sep 2011
          • 42

          #5
          galaxy issue

          Hello all,
          can anyone suggest how to go about this please.....
          I created a workflow and ran the workflow on my dataset from the workflow menu,which opened up the interface "running workflow on dataset..." in the middle part of the screen.
          Fine and dandy ! I made changes as needed in the parameters and clicked on "run workflow". Now the problem was that the page showed error in that part of the screen indicating the page does not exist or retype address and such, the other two column displays showing the tools on my left of the screen and the current history did not change it was as it is .
          Now my question is: do u think my workflow would have initiated ? do I need to rerun my workflow?
          I checked to see after sometime and still there was nothing. But then my dataset is large so maybe it is not enough time yet to show any outputs, but I dont want to wait two days and then realise that my workflow di dnot run at all !!!!
          Please suggest
          Thanks,
          geneart.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by SEQadmin2


            I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

            Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
            06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
          0 responses
          10 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
          0 responses
          13 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
          0 responses
          20 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
          0 responses
          54 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...