Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mathew
    Member
    • Jan 2011
    • 81

    BWA for virus

    I have a short read data from Hiseq (originally doen for mouse but has integrtaion of virus). I do have FASTq file of refrence genome. I was wondering what parameters I need to change if I use BWA/ Bowtie to align it. Can I use these or is there any other option

    Thanks
  • swbarnes2
    Senior Member
    • May 2008
    • 910

    #2
    You probably have a fasta of the viral reference, not a fastq.

    But bwa will handle that fine.

    For the best accuracy, what you want is a reference fasta with the whole mouse genome and the viral genome, and you align everything to that. But aligning to a mammalian genome is slow. Aligning to just your virus will be a whole lot faster, but you might get some mouse reads being forced to align to your virus. Maybe set it to only allow a single mismatch, then see if there are SNPs, fix your reference to match, and go again until you fix all those discrepancies.

    Comment

    • nanto
      Member
      • Sep 2012
      • 19

      #3
      It depends how much coverage you have with those fastq reads. BWA will create substrings either way. Considering reads are of good quality you might want to use suggested parameters by the program. Worth of changing is definitely -z to value 100

      How good reads are mapped you probably know, that % of mappeing from flagstat in samtools is not a good statistic for this. You should check NM values, number of hits per read, number of uniquely mapped reads and total number of mapped bases to choose finally best parameters for mapping. Try increasing penalties in b,q,r

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      25 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      23 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      23 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      55 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...