Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • lix
    Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 17

    MNase-seq data analysis

    Hi,

    Has anyone ever played with the MNase-seq datasets?
    I got some mouse datasets running but there seems several points should take into consideration:
    1. repetitive region: as about 50% of genome is repetitive sequence and these can arise those multiple alignments during the mapping stage. Generally, only uniquely mapped reads were filtered out for the downstream analysis, which means we lost about 50% region's information of the genome. That's critical if we want to see how about the repeat regions happened in the cell. I don't know if anyone did similar analysis and added the multi-reads and how to process them.
    2. input signal: in general ChIP-seq data, the control might generates some peak signal and one of the reason arise this is due to the open chromatin structure. But in this case, say, if I notice the input sharp signal, still, that might be due to the open chromatin in that region, yet might also be generated due to other unknown reason. Has anyone also crush similar problem and how to process them?
    3. peak callor choice: there are several peak callers for the mononucleosome calling, I'm just wondering whether MACS can also accomplish this if I'm not only interested in the mononucleosome peaks.

    Welcome any kinds of communications and suggestions.
    Thanks!

    lix
  • dawe
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2009
    • 258

    #2
    Hello there

    Originally posted by lix View Post
    2. input signal: in general ChIP-seq data, the control might generates some peak signal and one of the reason arise this is due to the open chromatin structure. But in this case, say, if I notice the input sharp signal, still, that might be due to the open chromatin in that region, yet might also be generated due to other unknown reason. Has anyone also crush similar problem and how to process them?
    If you have sharp signals in your input you should find them in IP too. BTW, MNase input should be naked DNA, which is not the same input as in general ChIP-seq data

    Originally posted by lix View Post
    3. peak callor choice: there are several peak callers for the mononucleosome calling, I'm just wondering whether MACS can also accomplish this if I'm not only interested in the mononucleosome peaks.
    If you google for that you may find something. BTW, I'm having good results with DANPOS which is still unpublished. An alternative is NPS. Problem is that you'll need a lot of custom scripts to extract some general information (i.e. phase, distograms, TSS depletion...)

    HTH

    d

    Comment

    • vkartha
      Member
      • Feb 2012
      • 28

      #3
      Originally posted by dawe View Post
      Hello there



      If you have sharp signals in your input you should find them in IP too. BTW, MNase input should be naked DNA, which is not the same input as in general ChIP-seq data



      If you google for that you may find something. BTW, I'm having good results with DANPOS which is still unpublished. An alternative is NPS. Problem is that you'll need a lot of custom scripts to extract some general information (i.e. phase, distograms, TSS depletion...)

      HTH

      d
      Hi, in an attempt to use Danpos using 2 bed tag alignment files as input, I am unable to get it to work correctly, we get the following error:

      python2.7 danpos.py tagAlign1-tagAlign2 -k 1
      danpos version 2.0.1
      command:
      python danpos.py tagAlign1-tagAlign2 -k 1

      Namespace(bg=None, clonalcut=1e-10, count=None, distance=100, edge=0, extend=80, fs=None, gapfill=0, height=5, keep=1, lmd=300, mafrsz=250, mifrsz=50, name='result', nor='F', paired=0, path='chr22.Gm12878.nuc.tagAlign-chr22.K562.nuc.tagAlign', pcfer=0, smooth_width=20, span=10, statis='P', testcut=1e-05, width=40)
      time elasped: 0.36073589325 seconds

      normalizing wigs ...
      less than 2 datasets, no normalization to be done
      saving normalized wigs ...
      time elasped: 0.360930919647 seconds

      pooling each group ...
      Traceback (most recent call last):
      File "danpos.py", line 125, in <module>
      runDANPOS()
      File "danpos.py", line 122, in runDANPOS
      smooth_width=args.smooth_width,paired=args.paired)
      File "functions.py", line 262, in danpos
      pooledgroups[groupname]=groups[groupname].pop(filenames[0])
      IndexError: list index out of range

      Am I missing something in terms of being able to tell DANPOS that these are the two files I want to compare nucleosomal positioning data on?

      Please help, urgent

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • mylaser
        Reply to Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
        by mylaser
        Kheloyar – Everything You Need to Know About Kheloyaar Login and Kheoyar Id
        If you are looking for an online gaming platform that offers a user-friendly experience, Kheloyar has become a name that many users search for. Whether you're interested in creating a new account, accessing your dashboard through Kheloyaar Login, or learning how to obtain a Kheoyar Id, understanding the platform's features and account process is essential.
        This guide explains everything you need to know about...
        Today, 01:13 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
        by SEQadmin2



        Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
        ...
        07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
        by SEQadmin2



        Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

        There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
        07-08-2026, 05:17 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
      0 responses
      11 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
      0 responses
      9 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
      0 responses
      17 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      31 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...