Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • empyrean
    Member
    • Sep 2010
    • 52

    250bp paired end Miseq reads alignment

    Hello all

    Recently we upgraded our miseq and got 2*250 run data. Does anyone have experience in aligning this sort of data? I have been using bwa till now for previous runs when it produced 2*150. Unable use bwa on this data using Bwasw as it didnot support paired end data. I am looking in to bowtie2 now to use as aligner. My references are amplicons and the size is approximately 2kb. In bowtie2, they are suggesting to use bowtie2 for longer genomes. Any thoughts on this?
  • krobison
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2007
    • 734

    #2
    One approach would be to use a tool such as FLASH to merge many of your read pairs into single reads, then align those long reads with bwasw.

    Of course, for what doesn't merge you still have the old problem. But for very long reads, and especially matching to a small target genome (amplicons), I'm wondering if just aligning them independently with bwasw will work just fine. Paired-end alignment is convenient and may give better specificity in some cases, but a large fraction of the time, particularly with a small genome, it isn't actually gaining anything. Of course, you will lose the convenient auto-generation of insert size information, and some sort of post-processing would be needed if you require that.

    Comment

    • JackieBadger
      Senior Member
      • Mar 2009
      • 385

      #3
      you can use Bowtie/Bowtie2...BLAT...BFAST

      Comment

      • swNGS
        Member
        • Nov 2011
        • 83

        #4
        The following paper suggests that bowtie2 offers a marginal advantage over bwasw when it comes to aligning 2x250 versus 2x150. They did use simulated data however, but worth experimenting with.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        23 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        23 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        23 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        55 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...