Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Xinlitik
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2012
    • 7

    Output of Cuffdiff has only XLOC

    This seems to be a common issue, but I think I have met all the criteria that people have said would solve it, and still am stuck. My Cuffdiff output files contain only Xloc identifiers. There aren't any gene names or the original ensembl ids. I provided an Ensembl GTF that contains the annotations with the -g command. The only bit of advice I didn't follow was using -G to prevent novel transcript location because that (along with alternate splicing) is the reason I am doing this analysis.

    Here is my truncated pipeline:
    tophat --solexa1.3-quals --no-coverage-search -g 1 -G /u/home/mcdb/xf/GTF/mm9.ensembl.gtf -p 8 -o ./$k /u/home/mcdb/x/bowtie-0.12.8/indexes/temp/mm9 $k.fastq

    cufflinks -p 8 -g /u/home/mcdb/x/GTF/mm9.ensembl.gtf -o /u/home/mcdb/x/y/ output name here

    cuffmerge -p 8 -s /u/home/mcdb/x/bowtie-0.12.8/indexes/genome.fa /u/home/mcdb/x/y/assemblies.txt #assemblies has the transcripts.gtf paths from cufflinks in it

    cuffdiff -o diff_out -b /u/home/mcdb/x/bowtie-0.12.8/indexes/genome.fa -p 8 -L C,R -u /u/home/mcdb/x/y/merged_asm/merged.gtf sample 1 bam sample 2 bam paths #(not listed here because there were many)

    Here's an example from the mm9.ensembl.gtf (Sorry for the poor formatting)
    chr18 protein_coding exon 3122455 3123465 . - . gene_id "ENSMUSG00000091539"; transcript_id "ENSMUST00000165255"; exon_number "1"; gene_name "Vmn1r238"; gene_biotype "protein_coding"; transcript_name "Vmn1r238-201";

    And here is an example from genes.fpkm_tracking:
    tracking_id class_code nearest_ref_id gene_id gene_short_name tss_id locus length coverage C_FPKM C_conf_lo C_conf_hi C_status R_FPKM R_conf_lo R_conf_hi R_status

    XLOC_000001 - - XLOC_000001 - TSS1 chr1:3044313-3044814 - - 0.592503 0 1.24438 OK 0.426783 0 0.890284 OK

    Is there something I have done wrong or a way for me to get Ensembl IDs or gene names into these output files? Thanks in advance
  • zimmernv
    Junior Member
    • Dec 2012
    • 4

    #2
    I get this problem as well. Since my setup is nearly identical, I'm not going to write down all the details. Why does the use of Ensembl GTF files and the Ensembl genomes then lead to XLOC values in the Cuffdiff output?

    Comment

    • jmwhitha
      Senior Member
      • Mar 2013
      • 107

      #3
      What I do is use the fpkm_tracking file and the complete genome record of my organism to create a GeneBank Excel file. Then, with my exp.diff files, I write a visual basic script to insert a column for "gene" (locus_tag) and "gene_long_name". So what I'm saying is that the XLOC tag can be linked to gene names and Ensembl IDs, and rather than cutting and pasting, VBA in Excel will automatically do it, which avoids human error. You just have to check to make sure you wrote the script correctly.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
        by SEQadmin2



        Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
        ...
        07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
        by SEQadmin2



        Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

        There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
        07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
      0 responses
      20 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
      0 responses
      31 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
      0 responses
      20 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
      0 responses
      34 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...