Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • AdrianP
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2011
    • 130

    #1

    Denovo RNA-Seq assembly using Velvet/Oases

    Hello dear colleagues,

    I feel like I should know the answer to what I am about to ask but I could not find a paper with a clear cut answer to what protocol I should apply. I am getting down to it:

    I have illumina pair-end reads from RNA-Seq of a fish that is very distant from anything sequenced. I have about 100 mil reads in both directions.

    I used Velvet Optimiser to perform denovo assemblies on has lengths 67 77 83 and 93 in order to look at the results and chose the best assembly. However, this is what I encountered (velvet):
    Hash 67 has about 250k contigs
    Hash 77 has about 125k contigs
    Hash 83 has about 78k contigs
    Hash 95 has about 15k contigs

    So not that big of a suprise, lower hashes more contigs, higher hashes are stricter because of their length, so less contigs.

    I polished these using Oasis, and the numbers did not change a lot.
    250k 149k 93k 16k
    n50s: 867 897 889 827

    I tried the -merge function suggested in the Oasis manual, and got 324k contigs and a bit higher n50 about 1000.

    Here comes the question, now what? which one is the best assembly? they can't all be as good. Which one should I annotate?

    Any help? I am very stuck.
  • AdrianP
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2011
    • 130

    #2
    bump. if anyone has any input i would love to hear it.

    Comment

    • CPCantalapiedra
      Member
      • Sep 2011
      • 38

      #3
      just asking, have you tried other software, like trinity to compare and get more clues for data interpretation?
      Maybe you could try too to compare some of the contigs with very highly conserved proteins among vertebrates?

      Comment

      • vbiaudet
        Member
        • Apr 2011
        • 14

        #4
        You could consider each kmer, I used velvet and oases with each kmer in descending kmer:
        I began with kmer=95
        --> take the contigs and us it (-long parameter) in the next velvet/oases with kmer=83
        --> continue this until the small kmer and you obtain one list of contigs

        After you have to use an other assembly of contigs as TGICL or iAssembler

        I applied this method to Arabidopsis transcripts and find 90% of contigs that are good compare to gene model...
        Last edited by vbiaudet; 11-27-2012, 08:34 AM.

        Comment

        • AdrianP
          Senior Member
          • Apr 2011
          • 130

          #5
          how far down do I go?

          Can anyone else explain to me what confidence is? I understand that it is when there are alternatively spliced transcripts, but what does a very low confidence mean?

          Comment

          • 2seq
            Junior Member
            • Oct 2012
            • 9

            #6
            bump...would like to hear more about this. I also like vbiaudet 's idea very much for getting one list of contigs. However, how does this message differ from the oasis merge function?

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
              by SEQadmin2



              Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

              Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
              ...
              10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
              by SEQadmin2


              Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

              We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
              ...
              09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:13 AM
            0 responses
            17 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:48 AM
            0 responses
            18 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
            0 responses
            36 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
            0 responses
            42 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...