Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • amarth
    Member
    • Dec 2012
    • 14

    Getting just a few alignments with Tophat2

    I made an alignment for a 1.1GB file, the RNA-seq reads were in fastq (Illumina) format. The reference was in fasta, so i decided to convert the large file to fasta...

    Later i made the bowtie libraries, and then i started. When tophat finished the work, i looked to the output folder, and i saw that the sequences aligned were a 28MB *.bam file, on the other hand, the sequences *rejected* were almost a 350MB *.bam file... I deduce that the file size is proportional to the sequences amount.

    So, i'm a rookie on Bioinformatics, and my question is: is it normal to have such file sizes on both files, or i'm just doing it wrong?
  • chadn737
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2009
    • 392

    #2
    1) Do not convert the reads to fasta. That is unnecessary, Tophat takes fastq files....your references will always be in fasta, this is not an issue.

    2) It sounds like you did have a lot of unmapped reads, but its impossible to diagnose the issue from what you have described. Try providing some information like, the exact commands you ran Tophat with or some examples of unmapped reads.

    Comment

    • amarth
      Member
      • Dec 2012
      • 14

      #3
      1) Thanks for the advice,

      2) Could it be the seq Quality?









      The Tophat2 command i ran was:
      tophat2 --sequence-length 100 --max-insertion-length 3 --max-deletion-length 3 reference index3.fasta
      so much thanks

      Comment

      • EGrassi
        Member
        • Oct 2010
        • 66

        #4
        What does samtools flagstat on the accepted_hits.bam and rejected looks like?

        Just to mention the fact: I had some paired data with fastqc results similar to yours and quality trimming lead me to nothing, the problem was about the -r/--mate-std-dev parameters (I had paired data): it seems that in some cases tophat really needs them (-r 300 --mate-std-dev 50 gave me a 60% percentage of properly paired reads against the 5% without them...I will never trust the FAQ/manual again ).

        Comment

        • kmcarr
          Senior Member
          • May 2008
          • 1181

          #5
          Originally posted by amarth View Post
          2) Could it be the seq Quality?
          The quality of your reads looks fine.
          The Tophat2 command i ran was:
          Code:
          tophat2 --sequence-length 100 --max-insertion-length 3 --max-deletion-length 3 reference index3.fasta
          so much thanks
          There is no '--sequence-length' option for tophat. Did you mean '--segment-length'? If so 100 (presumably the full length of your read) is not an appropriate setting. The default value for --segment-length (25) is appropriate for most cases.

          To diagnose the problem start using only default options and then work out from there.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
            by SEQadmin2



            Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

            There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
            Today, 05:17 AM
          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by SEQadmin2


            I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

            Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
            06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:08 AM
          0 responses
          6 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:05 AM
          0 responses
          8 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
          0 responses
          31 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
          0 responses
          29 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...