Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • amarth
    Member
    • Dec 2012
    • 14

    Getting just a few alignments with Tophat2

    I made an alignment for a 1.1GB file, the RNA-seq reads were in fastq (Illumina) format. The reference was in fasta, so i decided to convert the large file to fasta...

    Later i made the bowtie libraries, and then i started. When tophat finished the work, i looked to the output folder, and i saw that the sequences aligned were a 28MB *.bam file, on the other hand, the sequences *rejected* were almost a 350MB *.bam file... I deduce that the file size is proportional to the sequences amount.

    So, i'm a rookie on Bioinformatics, and my question is: is it normal to have such file sizes on both files, or i'm just doing it wrong?
  • chadn737
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2009
    • 392

    #2
    1) Do not convert the reads to fasta. That is unnecessary, Tophat takes fastq files....your references will always be in fasta, this is not an issue.

    2) It sounds like you did have a lot of unmapped reads, but its impossible to diagnose the issue from what you have described. Try providing some information like, the exact commands you ran Tophat with or some examples of unmapped reads.

    Comment

    • amarth
      Member
      • Dec 2012
      • 14

      #3
      1) Thanks for the advice,

      2) Could it be the seq Quality?









      The Tophat2 command i ran was:
      tophat2 --sequence-length 100 --max-insertion-length 3 --max-deletion-length 3 reference index3.fasta
      so much thanks

      Comment

      • EGrassi
        Member
        • Oct 2010
        • 66

        #4
        What does samtools flagstat on the accepted_hits.bam and rejected looks like?

        Just to mention the fact: I had some paired data with fastqc results similar to yours and quality trimming lead me to nothing, the problem was about the -r/--mate-std-dev parameters (I had paired data): it seems that in some cases tophat really needs them (-r 300 --mate-std-dev 50 gave me a 60% percentage of properly paired reads against the 5% without them...I will never trust the FAQ/manual again ).

        Comment

        • kmcarr
          Senior Member
          • May 2008
          • 1181

          #5
          Originally posted by amarth View Post
          2) Could it be the seq Quality?
          The quality of your reads looks fine.
          The Tophat2 command i ran was:
          Code:
          tophat2 --sequence-length 100 --max-insertion-length 3 --max-deletion-length 3 reference index3.fasta
          so much thanks
          There is no '--sequence-length' option for tophat. Did you mean '--segment-length'? If so 100 (presumably the full length of your read) is not an appropriate setting. The default value for --segment-length (25) is appropriate for most cases.

          To diagnose the problem start using only default options and then work out from there.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            Yesterday, 11:43 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by SEQadmin2


            I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

            Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
            06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
            by SEQadmin2


            Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


            The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
            ...
            06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
          0 responses
          11 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
          0 responses
          18 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
          0 responses
          52 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
          0 responses
          111 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...