base quality encoding changed after "bwa samse" command

[tomjan]

hello,

Please look at base quality string in my sample2New.fq file


@EBRI093151_0051:4:55:2998:9540#0/1
ACAACACAGTGGGTTGGAGTAGAGCATCTCCAAAGGCCCTTTCCAATCCAACATGAGTAACTCAAGCTCTGCACCAGCCACGAAAAGGCAAGGCTTTGGAT
+
FFFFFFFFFFDFFBFDEAEEEFFFFFFFFCFFEFFCEEEDDFFEEEFEADDFDFDEEDFFE@FCDDD>ACDFADD?CCECDB<?@047:9@?BB+B@@@]]


after commands

opt/bwa-0.6.2/bwa index -a bwtsw -p ref reference.fa
/opt/bwa-0.6.2/bwa aln -t 10 -f sample2New.sai -I ref sample2New.fq
/opt/bwa-0.6.2/bwa samse -f sample2New.sam -r "@RG\tID:sample2\tPL:ILLUMINA\tPUu1\tLB:sample2\tSM:sample2" ref sample2New.sai sample2New.fq


I can see changed base quality string in the sample2New.sam file

EBRI093151_0051:4:55:2998:9540#0 0 Chr10 377653 0 101M * 0 0 ACAACACAGTGGGTTGGAGTAGAGCATCTCCAAAGGCCCTTTCCAATCCAACATGAGTAACTCAAGCTCTGCACCAGCCACGAAAAGGCAAGGCTTTGGAT ''''''''''%''#'%&"&&&''''''''$''&''$&&&%%''&&&'&"%%'%'%&&%''&!'$%%%^_"$%'"%% $$&$%#^] !^Q^U^XESC^Z! ##^L#!!!>> RG:Z:sample2 XT:A:R NM:i:0 X0:i:3 X1:i:0 XM:i:0 XO:i:0 XG:i:0 MD:Z:101 XA:Z:Chr10,+33,101M,0;Chr10,+242847,101M,0;


and ofcourse the command

java -Xmx8g -jar /opt/picard-tools-1.85/SortSam.jar SO=coordinate INPUT=sample2New.sam OUTPUT=sample2New.bam VALIDATION_STRINGENCY=LENIENT CREATE_INDEX=true

fails with error

Exception in thread "main" java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid fastq character:

Why "bwa samse" is changing quality encoding??
Do you have an idea what Im doing wrong?

thanks

[maubp]

Could you edit your post to use the [ code ] and [ /code ] tags? This is easily done via the advanced editor view where there is a button for this in the tool bar (not shown in the quick reply edit box).

[maubp]

I've not checked all the bases (due to the forum formatting), however, it would appear to be down to a FASTQ encoding problem. It appears bwa defaulted to assuming the obsolete Illumina specific ASCII encoding of PHRED+64, while your data was actually the original standard Sanger ASCII encoding of PHRED+33 (now adopted by Illumina). For background, see:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp1137

In your FASTQ file, the first base has quality code 'F', ASCII character 70. Under the Sanger FASTQ scheme that means 70-33 = quality 37. However, if read in as the obsolete Illumina scheme it would be 70-64 = 6 quality, which when output again in SAM format (which uses the Sanger FASTQ scheme) becomes 6+33 = ASCII 39 = ' (single quote).

Solution - there is a command line option to tell bwa you have a Sanger style FASTQ file. Use it, otherwise you get a bad SAM/BAM file.

[tomjan]

Thank you for your help Maubp,

Your explanations helped me to find the solutions

The problem was in "bwa aln" cmmand
/opt/bwa-0.6.2/bwa aln -t 10 -f sample2New.sai -I ref sample2New.fq

from the documentation we can se "-I The input is in the Illumina 1.3+ read format (quality equals ASCII-64). ". So, everything is OK when I ommit the -I option.

/opt/bwa-0.6.2/bwa aln -t 10 -f sample2New.sai ref sample2New.fq


Once again, Thank You for your help.

[maubp]

Well done - and thank you for posting back with the details for anyone searching about this again in the future.

(I couldn't remember the details about the switch, and wasn't at a machine where I could quickly check - but this way you'll probably remember the problem and solution )