Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • lorendarith
    • Jul 2026

    Direct 16S amplicon sequencing?

    Has anyone ever tried doing an amplicon sequencing on "non-enriched" amplicons? The idea is to basically just fragment everything, add Truseq adapters (with indexes) and then sequence using a custom sequencing primer and index 1 primer?

    I do realize that getting such samples to satisfying cluster densities (of sequenceable fragments) might be very hard due to the presence of undesired fragments which would also form clusters. But what if you could reduce the overall noise of undesired fragments (but not eliminate them completely), would this direct sequencing then have more sense?

    I would just like to get completely rid of the PCR bias before sequencing...

    Any thoughts?
  • TonyBrooks
    Senior Member
    • Jun 2009
    • 303

    #2
    Originally posted by lorendarith View Post
    Has anyone ever tried doing an amplicon sequencing on "non-enriched" amplicons? The idea is to basically just fragment everything, add Truseq adapters (with indexes) and then sequence using a custom sequencing primer and index 1 primer?

    I do realize that getting such samples to satisfying cluster densities (of sequenceable fragments) might be very hard due to the presence of undesired fragments which would also form clusters. But what if you could reduce the overall noise of undesired fragments (but not eliminate them completely), would this direct sequencing then have more sense?

    I would just like to get completely rid of the PCR bias before sequencing...

    Any thoughts?
    So you're talking about whole genome metagenomics?
    We've done that on 454, but we still use some amplification for Illumina. We thought about trying the new Illumina PCR-free kit, but the 2µg input for 550bp insert is a killer.

    Comment

    • lorendarith

      #3
      Originally posted by TonyBrooks View Post
      So you're talking about whole genome metagenomics?
      We've done that on 454, but we still use some amplification for Illumina. We thought about trying the new Illumina PCR-free kit, but the 2µg input for 550bp insert is a killer.
      Yeah, it's sort of like WGS, but you wouldn't get the rest which is not 16S.
      The advantage from just doing WGS would be that you have fragments on the flowcell where the 16S part starts beyond 100 or 250 bp of the adapter, you would still get this information.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
        by SEQadmin2



        Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
        ...
        Yesterday, 11:10 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
        by SEQadmin2



        Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

        There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
        07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:04 AM
      0 responses
      10 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
      0 responses
      7 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
      0 responses
      15 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      31 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...