Tweet
Did you know you can save ~90% on your Nextera Sample Prep cost by miniaturization?
In a recent work that we did at one of the large East Coast pharmas the sample prep cost for Nextera was reduced from $70 to $1.40/sample. We would be more than happy to share the protocol.
-
-
could you please to post the protocol? or you send it to email? Thanks in advance. -
Would you send me the protocol. Thank you.Comment
-
Yes, I'd love to take a look. What a great thing to share.Comment
-
I will be happy to send the protocol. Please send an email to me at [email protected] to get a copy.Comment
-
A colleague send you an email asking for the protocol. Based on your answer I would like to say the following: it would have been nice to include a disclaimer that you work for a commercial company, and that using your protocol involves buying a liquid handler from you. You did not include the actual protocol in your email but instead suggested a demo of your instrument.
Please refrain from using this forum for marketing in this non-transparant way.Comment
-
Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
Probing...Today, 11:10 AM -
Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.
There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...Yesterday, 05:17 AM -
Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
Comment