Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mark
    Member
    • Nov 2008
    • 54

    IDBA-UD assembler

    Hi All

    Has anyone given the idba-ud assembler a try? My first go at it produced a bacterial genome assembly quite inferior to what I had achieved with Velvetoptimiser, but proper parameterization of idba is not exactly clear to me. What has your experience been?

    Mark
  • lanzen
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2012
    • 2

    #2
    Hi Mark,

    I am about to try it now with some mixed (by mistake) metagenome and metatranscriptome data. I found the algorithm very appealing for this purpose, since the main problem will be extremely variable coverage. I will let you know how it turns out.

    Did you try it for metagenome data? I don't think there is much point in using for a normal single genome assembly..

    Comment

    • luperci
      Junior Member
      • Mar 2009
      • 3

      #3
      lanzen,

      How did it go? I'm currently trying to use idba-ud to do a metagenomic assembly of a goat gut. Do you know if there is a way to limit the memory usage? We run all our analysis using a cluster, and my job got killed because it went over the requested memory.

      Comment

      • lanzen
        Junior Member
        • Mar 2012
        • 2

        #4
        For me it worked quite fine, but most contigs were short, so it is unclear to me what was the (contaminating) metagenomic data that I tried to remove or what was from shorter transcripts. This may not be the fault of the assembly algorithm though. I will try a more normal dataset and let you know.

        Otherwise, it did not use that much memory or calculation time. A 32Gb machine seemed with 8 cores was enough and the job finished in 30 min.

        Let me know if there is something else I can do to help you.

        Comment

        • luperci
          Junior Member
          • Mar 2009
          • 3

          #5
          I allocated 30 cores and 300 GB and it ran for around 7 hours before being stopped. I have a feeling the sample was really over sequenced. Right now I looking into doing some preprocessing to clean up the reads a little. Hopefully that will help limit the resource usage. Thanks.

          Comment

          • mstagliamonte
            Member
            • Feb 2013
            • 33

            #6
            Hi,


            sorry to revive an old thread. I did two idba runs, one using only one fasta file, the other using two files (two separate illumina runs for the same sample).

            In the first idba run, the file contig.fa had no read counts, while they were present in the scaffold.fa.
            At the second attempt (using two fasta files), it was the opposite!

            Any idea what's happening?
            Max

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
              by SEQadmin2



              Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

              There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
              Today, 05:17 AM
            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by SEQadmin2


              I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

              Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
              06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:08 AM
            0 responses
            6 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:05 AM
            0 responses
            8 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
            0 responses
            31 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
            0 responses
            29 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...