Originally posted by molly burns
View Post
Unconfigured Ad
Collapse
X
-
Get rid of big fragments
I need to remove fragments > 500bp and already removed everything <100bp (I basically have a smear that starts around 100-150bp). I would like to try to use 0.7x (from bluescript gel) and keep the supernatant.
What would you do next? Clean-up the supernatant with Qiaquick or MinElute or add 1.8x beads and start all over again?
Comment
-
-
You can add 1.8x beads and it will work. The idea is that you need to get the PEG concentration above whatever the threshold is for the size you care about. You could actually get away with less than 1.8x beads since you already have 0.7x bead solution, but it won't hurt to add more.Originally posted by odile View PostI need to remove fragments > 500bp and already removed everything <100bp (I basically have a smear that starts around 100-150bp). I would like to try to use 0.7x (from bluescript gel) and keep the supernatant.
What would you do next? Clean-up the supernatant with Qiaquick or MinElute or add 1.8x beads and start all over again?
Comment
-
-
I am sorry about the Necro Post, but I have a problem in this moment about this. Could you tell me the weigth (in bp) of your 1 kb ladder? It would be very useful for my thesis. Thanks a lot.Originally posted by pbluescript View PostI have attached an image showing the effect of altering the ratio of AMPure beads/sample. You can see that using a lower ratio will remove increasing sizes of DNA fragments. You can even use this for size selection by using two different concentrations. For example, if you wanted to get a band centered ~400 bp, you could use 0.7X beads and then take the supernatant. This would include all the DNA fragments that were smaller than ~500bp and didn't bind to the beads. Then mix the supernatant with 0.9X beads and everything larger than ~300bp would bind. Elute the bound DNA and you'll have a fairly broad, but good enough to sequence, library.
If you try the beads, there can be a bit of lot-to-lot variability, so I would test them with a 100 bp library as I did in this gel.
I haven't used the Truseq kit, but I have used the Truseq adapters with outsourced enzymes/buffers and the same problem can occur.Do you know about Agilent Haloplex? Help me please!
Comment
-
-
The 100 bp ladder in the image is this one:Originally posted by DavidAntonio View PostI am sorry about the Necro Post, but I have a problem in this moment about this. Could you tell me the weigth (in bp) of your 1 kb ladder? It would be very useful for my thesis. Thanks a lot.
The 1kb+ ladder in the image is this one:
Comment
-
-
Thank you so much. Excuse, but I have another question; Have you used Agilent Haloplex?Originally posted by pbluescript View PostThe 100 bp ladder in the image is this one:
The 1kb+ ladder in the image is this one:
http://products.invitrogen.com/ivgn/product/10787026Do you know about Agilent Haloplex? Help me please!
Comment
-
-
He's using both. The 100 bp ladder was what he was size-selecting (to illustrate the use of the SPRI bead ratios), the 1kb+ ladder is the size marker for the gel.Originally posted by rnaeye View Postpbluescript,
what is the DNA ladder you used on this gel. thank you!
Take a look again at the text above each lane.
Comment
-
-
Thanks much for the tips. I was always bothered by the primer dimer when used NEB kits for library prep. The AMPure XP worked fabulously for size selection, however didn't work for getting rid of the primer dimer. I had to use Pippin Prep to clean-up the products, which caused more than half loss. After switched to Nextera kit, no more primer dimer problem, but primer contamination presented sometimes. The manufacturer's suggestion is only 25uL beads for 50uL products. I would try your 1.8:1 ratio next time.Originally posted by Simone78 View PostI had the same problem(s). To get rid of the adaptor-adaptor dimers I now do size selection using 2% E-gel (great because you can also select more than one single fraction, so you have a backup in case something goes wrong during the pre-amplification step). And you don't need an additional purification step, just pipette out the water (containing your DNA) from the well. To remove the primer dimers I use AMPure XP (1.8:1 ratio) which removes (almost) 100% of the fragments <100 bp.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by pbluescript View PostI have attached an image showing the effect of altering the ratio of AMPure beads/sample. You can see that using a lower ratio will remove increasing sizes of DNA fragments. You can even use this for size selection by using two different concentrations. For example, if you wanted to get a band centered ~400 bp, you could use 0.7X beads and then take the supernatant. This would include all the DNA fragments that were smaller than ~500bp and didn't bind to the beads. Then mix the supernatant with 0.9X beads and everything larger than ~300bp would bind. Elute the bound DNA and you'll have a fairly broad, but good enough to sequence, library.
If you try the beads, there can be a bit of lot-to-lot variability, so I would test them with a 100 bp library as I did in this gel.
I haven't used the Truseq kit, but I have used the Truseq adapters with outsourced enzymes/buffers and the same problem can occur.
Great job! I played with this too. But my concern focused on the size adjusted concentration, your gel is very convincible.
Comment
-
-
Did you mean, the already purified DNA library to go another PCR at about 5 cycles, checked by bioanalyzer then go amplification again in 10-15 cycles to accumulate enough yield for sequencing?Originally posted by monad View Post2nd gel purification is the best option here, but you lose lots of library DNA. In this case, you can set additional round of PCR will take care of it. Stick with not more than 5 round of PCR. If your bioanalyer peak is good, you will be fine even with 10-15 cycles of PCR.
Comment
-
-
thank you so much for the low-bind tube tip. I tried the same procedure, got the perfect size selected and clean library prep products, but much lower yield. Lucky to me, it's still sequencable, but very scary.Originally posted by pmiguel View PostI have a partial answer. We tried a few modifications to the TruSeq protocol, one of which was to do the PCR step on non-size selected library, followed by size selection on the Pippin Prep. Our yield of final library was much lower than what we got following the normal protocol. But it was still enough to sequence.
It worked.
But there are a couple of additional issues for a non-amplified library:
(1) The Y-adapters apparently cause library fragments to migrate aberrantly on some, but not all, electrophoretic conditions. Details are in another thread. I think they may run at their correct size on e-gels, but appear larger than they actually are under most commonly used electrophoretic conditions. After enrichment PCR the adapters are no longer Y-ed, so the effect disappears and you see the amplicon's true sizes.
(2) Just to state the obvious: when you work with very limiting amounts of DNA, you have to watch losses to binding against plastic-ware, etc. A typical microfuge tube may be able to bind 1 ng of DNA (complete guess.) So, if you have 200 ng, who cares. But if you have 1 ng total, you might lose the majority of your library if you don't use low-bind plastic-ware.
--
Phillip
Comment
-
-
DEpending on which fragments you want to retain and which ones you would like to get rid of. To remove short fragments (dimers/primers) use a 0.8-1:1 ratio beadsOriginally posted by XIAOXIAO View PostHey if you used AmPure beads for purification, what is the ratio of library versus beads for purificaiton?
NA. If you want to pull down everything use a 1.8:1. If you want a specific size range, do a double (two-sided) purification where in the first your DNA is in the supernatant and in the second is on the beads, or vice versa.
Best,
Simone
Comment
-
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by SEQadmin2
Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.
The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
...-
Channel: Articles
06-02-2026, 10:05 AM -
-
by SEQadmin2
With the launch of new single-cell sequencing platforms in 2026, the field stands at an exciting inflection point. This article surveys the most impactful advances in the field and discusses how they’re reshaping research in cancer, immunology, and beyond.
Introduction
Single-cell sequencing technologies have undergone remarkable advances over the past decade, transitioning from low-throughput experimental approaches to highly scalable platforms capable of...-
Channel: Articles
05-22-2026, 06:42 AM -
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
| Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:09 AM
|
0 responses
10 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
Yesterday, 10:09 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
|
0 responses
17 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 12:03 PM
|
0 responses
26 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
06-02-2026, 12:03 PM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 11:40 AM
|
0 responses
21 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
06-02-2026, 11:40 AM
|
Comment