Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dina
    Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 34

    blast of the contigs

    Hello,
    I've sequenced a genome and received contigs. I'm trying to blast the contigs using megablast installed locally on our computer. For many of the contigs I receive the error message: could not calculate ungapped Karlin0Altshul parameters due to an invalid query sequence or its translation. Please verify the query sequence and/ or filtering options" .
    Anybody knows what this means? Thank you !!!
  • rglover
    rg
    • Dec 2008
    • 51

    #2
    Hi,
    How big are your contigs? It would help if you could let us know what parameters/commands you are using to run the blast.
    I've sometimes had that error message on 454 reads that consist only of sequence like (AC)n etc.
    Cheers,
    Rachel

    Comment

    • dina
      Member
      • Sep 2009
      • 34

      #3
      blast

      Than you for your reply, I'm using the command:
      megablast -b -1 -m 9 -i mapping/454AllContigs.fna -d /root/genome_annotation/blast/ncbi_nt/nt>blastout.txt

      There are different contigs some are short and others are long

      Comment

      • westerman
        Rick Westerman
        • Jun 2008
        • 1104

        #4
        That command line parameter of '-b -1' looks wrong. I will assume that you meant to and are actually using '-b 1' In which case I'll agree with rglover that it is either the composition and/or length of your input sequences that is causing problems. I suspect that we all run into that error message when we work with off-the-sequencer sequences.

        It would be helpful if you could post

        (a) approximately how many of your sequences are having the problem (i.e., 1%, 10%, 50%?)

        (b) the actual nucleotides in one or two of your problem sequences

        Comment

        • dina
          Member
          • Sep 2009
          • 34

          #5
          blast

          It happens for about 10% of the reads. I guess it is indeed because the quality of the read.
          another question about blast: when I run it with this command:megablast, I receive in the end a big html file, part of wfich just says "no hits" for some of the contigs. Is there any way to present it in a more readable format? begining with the best hits (aas in the web) and to show the aligment (the format that I recive when I run blast at the web),
          Thanks alot!

          Comment

          • westerman
            Rick Westerman
            • Jun 2008
            • 1104

            #6
            Your question "as in the web" is vague. I presume you are talking about NCBI blast but even there you can receive the results back in a variety of different formats. Their default is closer to the '-m 0' format. If you have looked at the other megablast format besides the one you gave (e.g., -m 9) and none of them a good for you then please describe exactly what you want and maybe we can help out.

            Personally when looking at the thousands of sequences I usually get with a 2nd gen sequencing project, the '-m 8' (tabular) or '-m 7' options are the ones I use. Formats besides those two become hard to parse and summarize. But your requirements are probably much different than mine.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by SEQadmin2


              I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

              Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
              06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
            0 responses
            7 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
            0 responses
            11 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
            0 responses
            19 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
            0 responses
            53 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...