View Single Post
Old 11-25-2012, 06:14 AM   #10
Location: helsinki

Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 54
Default Script

Originally Posted by SMO View Post
My lab has been using the Agilent 50Mb SureSelect Human All Exon kit for many months now. Though the data is acceptable, we canít help but wonder why our coverage plots look so different from Agilent coverage plots. (see attachment) Do other users produce data that results in coverage plots similar to those advertised by Agilent? If so, do you have any suggestions as to why we are seeing this disparity? Or, are our results the accepted norm?

could you provide the script, with which you have generated the plot shown in "human coverage plot.pdf" ?
meher is offline   Reply With Quote