View Single Post
Old 01-26-2016, 10:34 AM   #29
Ingeneious
Member
 
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 30
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jwfoley View Post
Okay, so basically no cost-per-read advantage over the MiSeq either.
There is a cost / read advantage if you are doing 2 x 150 PE sequencing. 50% of the capital cost of the MiSeq and the NextSeq-esque wash system also means less maintenance than the MiSeq.

Overally though, looks like it is targeted to researchers seeking to trade off the lower up front cost for slightly higher run costs and reduced capacity.

Last edited by Ingeneious; 01-26-2016 at 01:43 PM.
Ingeneious is offline   Reply With Quote