Tweet
Those aren't raw counts, they're estimated raw counts.
Hint: don't try to coerce cufflinks data into DESeq.
Hint: don't try to coerce cufflinks data into DESeq.
-
-
So, you saw that since these are estimated raw counts and they are coming from cufflinks which are infact considering noise for duplicate read counts as well. However for DESeq we donot consider the duplicate read counts right? For DESeq each counting unit is evidence of one sequencing read. So we should not consider this estimated raw count and rather generate the raw count using HT-Seq for my data and then use them for DESeq analysis? Is that what you want to mean?Comment
-
The validity of the statistical model used by DESeq depends on its input being integer read counts directly from individual samples. Trying to use anything else will just produce unreliable results.
So yes, use htseq-count to generate your count matrix.Comment
-
Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...04-04-2024, 04:25 PM -
Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...03-22-2024, 06:39 AM
Comment