View Single Post
Old 05-08-2015, 08:02 AM   #6
pmiguel
Senior Member
 
Location: Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana

Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,317
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DNATECH View Post
Hello,

in case you are interested, we have posted some results from our first HiSeq 3000 runs as well as some information and considerations on the changes introduced by the new HiSeq 3000 and Hiseq 4000 sequencer generation. The yields on the first two runs were higher than expected at about 340 million reads per lane.
You mean 340 million pass-filter clusters per lane?

--
Phillip
pmiguel is offline   Reply With Quote