View Single Post
Old 12-04-2014, 05:29 PM   #13
Brian Bushnell
Super Moderator
 
Location: Walnut Creek, CA

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 2,707
Default

I already looked at this one: "NextSeq 500: TruSeq Nano 2x151 (PhiX)"
...and it's just as bad as ours. But thanks for the suggestion; I'll take a look at the others, as they may have used a different machine. Still, I'm kind of hoping for data from e.g. bryanbriney, as his machine seems to be producing data on-par with HiSeq machines.
Brian Bushnell is offline   Reply With Quote