Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • HiSeq versus Solid for DGE

    Dear All,
    this is my first post.
    I have to make purchasing decision for a sequencer for the my lab in the next two months.
    My need is simple - replace microarray gene expression profiling for formalin fixed paraffin embedded samples with DGE to get more reproducible data.
    I looked at most recent protocols using DSN from Illuimina and SAGE-Seq from ABI. Illumina protcol looks simpler but new ABI 5500 seems to be very flexible since it allows sequencing in each lane and may be helpful for us to experiment with different conditions because we have to deal with samples from many different institutions.
    Any recommendations?
    thanks!
    Soon Paik
    NSABP

  • #2
    We do not yet own an Illumina sequencer, so I can't give you a direct comparison. But my impression is that the Solid beats Illumina at price per base (for reagents and instrument service contract costs) and in accuracy. But no good method for de novo transcriptomics exists for solid reads. Also, part of what makes the solid accurate -- color space base calls, also makes analysis with standard tools somewhat more complex. (But this is supposed to be largely solved in the solid 5500.)

    --
    Phillip

    Comment


    • #3
      Note Nugen is coming out with a FFPE RNA-Seq kit. I know it works with Illumina not sure with the SOLiD or 5500.

      Also, Illumina just released the HiSeq 1000 (single flowcell). I don't know it's price tho.

      Comment


      • #4
        pmiguel and NexGenSeq,
        thanks for the replies..
        any experience with illumina barcoding with DGE? are they easy to use?
        thanks again
        Soon Paik

        Comment


        • #5
          I find Illumina's library kits to be vastly overpriced. Check out Nugen, Epicentre or NEB for their kits.

          Comment


          • #6
            thanks again NextGenSeq,
            i have a situation - we just got notified that from our award we can use only 480k for infrastructure - so our choice for the sequencer is limited unless we get a great deal from illumina for HySeq1000. We do not need big server since we will use cloud and collaborate with bioinformatics group overseas for sequence analysis part. We will have to make choices among GA IIx (refurbished - and very cheap) vs HiScan with sequencing module vs HySeq1000 (if we get discount) vs Solid. For SAGE type application, I am not sure which one we should get even after having extensive discussions with both company's application specialists.
            any advice would be greatly appreciated
            thanks
            Soon Paik

            Comment


            • #7
              The SOLiD is being replaced by the 5500. For your budget I think only the 5500, the refurbished GAIIX, the HiScan or possibly the HiSeq 1000 (what is the price of this?) fit.

              If you get the 5500 make sure you get the EZ Bead. The reagent cost of the 5500 is now cheaper than the Illumina systems. LIFE is aggressively pursuing the next gen market and is more likely to deal.

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • seqadmin
                Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
                by seqadmin




                The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist...
                04-22-2024, 07:01 AM
              • seqadmin
                Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
                by seqadmin


                Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
                04-04-2024, 04:25 PM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 08:47 AM
              0 responses
              12 views
              0 likes
              Last Post seqadmin  
              Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
              0 responses
              60 views
              0 likes
              Last Post seqadmin  
              Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
              0 responses
              60 views
              0 likes
              Last Post seqadmin  
              Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
              0 responses
              54 views
              0 likes
              Last Post seqadmin  
              Working...
              X