Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Are unequal pool sizes for RNA-seq acceptable?

    Background:
    I want to find differentially expressed genes between wild type (WT) and knockout (KO) mice of mixed background using RNA-seq (Illumina HiSeq, 50M reads standard at my core). There will be anywhere between 1-4 KO and 1-4 WT animals per litter.

    Because it is difficult to isolate enough cells from one animal, I need to pool cells from WT littermates and KO littermates. I need 2 animals minimum, but 3 and up is preferable. My thinking is that each litter will be one biological replicate, and I plan to sequence RNA from 3-5 litters (3-5 biological replicates). Because the number of KO vs. WT animals within a litter varies, I may have more of one genotype than the other.

    Question:
    If I had this scenario:
    Bio rep 1: Pool of 3 WT and Pool of 2 KO
    Bio rep 2: Pool of 2 WT and Pool of 2 KO
    Bio rep 3: Pool of 2 WT and Pool of 4 KO

    ...or any combination thereof, would this be a statistically poor design? Should I keep the number of animals in each pool constant for all biological replicates? Only within biological replicates?

    Another consideration: Will this be representative of only one mating cage? Cost/time is limited to maybe one time on the sequencer, two chips.

  • #2
    In the age of single-cell RNAseq, there's little remaining reason to pool multiple samples like that.

    BTW, I'm glad you're taking litter into account. A lot of people don't do that and then their results end up being do to a litter effect.

    Comment


    • #3
      So you're saying what exactly? Pool size doesn't matter? Keep pool size equal at the minimum of 2 and the sequencing can take care of the rest?

      Comment


      • #4
        I'm saying pooling is a last resort. Try to find someone local doing single-cell sequencing and you'll be able to both increase your N and eliminate pooling in one go.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • seqadmin
          Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
          by seqadmin


          Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
          04-04-2024, 04:25 PM
        • seqadmin
          Strategies for Sequencing Challenging Samples
          by seqadmin


          Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...
          03-22-2024, 06:39 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
        0 responses
        25 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
        0 responses
        28 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
        0 responses
        24 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
        0 responses
        52 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Working...
        X