View Single Post
Old 05-19-2011, 08:07 AM   #15
SeqAA
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GW_OK View Post
Whoever makes the reagents is the one who should be on the hook if they don't work properly. And that speaks to the honesty of the researcher, I think. The companies can also request lot numbers and such to verify.
I understand your advocacy of the devil, but if the company says outright that non-authorized reagents won't be supported, what's the harm in at least telling us what they are? And if they are patented, let us know that, too. I don't think anybody' going to be making a buck off something if it's already patented. Plus, if you're working on something that is going to head into IP territory, you can at least know where the boundaries are...
See, this just sounds too reasonable
  Reply With Quote