Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Cutoffs for differential Expression analysis (DESeq and Cufflinks/Cuffdiff)

    Hey All,

    This is my first post, so please bear with me.

    I have been doing differential expression with DESeq and Cuffdiff.

    I just wondered at what level do people usually exclude genes from analysis.

    For example in DEseq, what number of raw counts do you exclude (i.e.- 10 and up, etc)?

    For Cuffdiff, what level do you cut off RPKM/FPKM. (i.e.- 1 and above use for differntial expression)?

    Also, for multiple samples do you sort all sample types by expression and remove all genes for each sample at that value?

    Sorry if this is confusing. Thanks!

  • #2
    For cuffdiff i normally use 10 as the minimum per-locus counts for significance testing. Hope this helps... I'm now trying to get DESeq working so can't help with that one...

    Comment


    • #3
      For DESeq I exclude genes with <20 counts (summed across all samples). Those are usually too few counts to calculate a meaningful statistic (see the Bourgon et al. (2010) paper in PNAS or the DESeq vignette, though I don't recall either of those giving specific recommendations for a threshold...).

      Comment


      • #4
        Hi dpyan
        Can you share the commands that you used for DESeq so i can see a functional example to try and guide my future attempts?

        Comment


        • #5
          Have a look at the "Filtering by overall count" section of the DESeq vignette, which I'll just copy and modify below:
          Code:
          rs = rowSums(counts(cdsFull))
          use = (rs > 20)
          cdsFilt = cdsFull[use,]
          The actual threshold that's best will probably vary by sample number, it's convenient to make the plot they have in the vignette as "Figure 9" so you can eyeball if the threshold is inappropriate. See also "Figure 10".

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • seqadmin
            Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
            by seqadmin


            Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
            04-04-2024, 04:25 PM
          • seqadmin
            Strategies for Sequencing Challenging Samples
            by seqadmin


            Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...
            03-22-2024, 06:39 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
          0 responses
          18 views
          0 likes
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
          0 responses
          22 views
          0 likes
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
          0 responses
          16 views
          0 likes
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
          0 responses
          47 views
          0 likes
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Working...
          X