View Single Post
Old 03-19-2015, 11:36 AM   #2
lorendarith
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default

Hi, I would generally say that WGS is insensitive to these issues.

I'm also doing metagenomics and 16S, so I can see where you're coming from... However, you should not see any differences if you resequence a library on the same machine or prepare another one from the same DNA pool, or extract DNA from the same or an identical sample. Eventual differences could come from source DNA degradation over time, changing the polymerases in the PCR (for GC-low and -high regions), sequencing chemistry upgrade and so on... which seems kinda obvious, no? As long as you keep all steps the same, there should not be any differences. Some days the sequencer can have a bad day so you might just get less and cappier data. If something is really wrong with your adapter ligation and subsequent PCR enrichment you can end up with more primer dimers and chimeric sequences, but the biologically relevant and correct sequences should perform equally well as before.

What you can see is an adapter effect, depending on what kits you use and how experienced you are with plates. Especially if you are using custom designed adapters, there might be some combinations which are less balanced than others, so you'll just end up with a more obvious difference in the number of reads for each particular adapter sequence.

Just, my experience til now.
  Reply With Quote